Skip to content

SenoMark® Ultra Breast Tissue Marker SMAT9CRecalls & reported problems

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · SENOMARK® ULTRA Breast Tissue Marker, 9 Ga ATEC, BioDur Coil · Class 2 · Implant

All models of SenoMark Ultra Breast Tissue Marker (8)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741032080), received between Sep 14, 2021 and Sep 16, 2021 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material3
  • Image Display Error/Artifact1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 16, 2021Image Display Error/Artifact; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Image Display Error/Artifact; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT POST BREAST MARKER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE ALLEGEDLY HAD FOREIGN MATERIAL. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12479013 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 14, 2021Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A BREAST MARKER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE FOREIGN MATERIAL WAS ALLEGEDLY FOUND TO BE DEPLOYED UPON MARKER DEPLOYMENT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12465989 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 14, 2021Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A BREAST MARKER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE FOREIGN MATERIAL WAS ALLEGEDLY FOUND TO BE DEPLOYED UPON MARKER DEPLOYMENT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12465876 ↗

Other MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE devices

All MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page