Skip to content

Ponsky Non-Ballon Replacement (NBR) Gastrostomy Tube 000700Recalls & reported problems

Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Ponsky NBR Gastrostomy Tube 20F · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741036286), received between Oct 11, 2019 and May 14, 2020 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Component Missing” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Component Missing2
  • Fitting Problem1
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
  • No Patient Involvement1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 14, 2020Loose or Intermittent Connection; Loose or Intermittent Connection

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT SOME TIME POST FEEDING TUBE PLACEMENT, THE END CAP ALLEGEDLY WOULD NOT SEAL. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10057978 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 10, 2020Fitting Problem; Fitting Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY THREE WEEKS POST GASTROSTOMY FEEDING TUBE PLACEMENT, THE PLUG ALLEGEDLY DISCONNECTED FROM THE FEEDING PORT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9687393 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 11, 2019Component Missing; Component Missing

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A FEEDING TUBE PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE OBTURATOR WAS ALLEGEDLY MISSING. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9182698 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 11, 2019Component Missing; Component Missing

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE OBTURATOR WAS ALLEGEDLY MISSING FROM THE KIT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9182624 ↗

Other TUBES, GASTROINTESTINAL (AND ACCESSORIES) devices

All TUBES, GASTROINTESTINAL (AND ACCESSORIES) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page