Skip to content

Bard® Clean-Cath® Intermittent Catheter 420714Recalls & reported problems

C. R. Bard, Inc. · Bard® Clean-Cath® Intermittent Catheter · Class 2

All models of Bard Clean-Cath Intermittent Catheter (15)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741038747), received between Nov 7, 2018 and Dec 7, 2020 — classified as 3 injuries, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Insert” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Insert2
  • Material Twisted/Bent2
  • Break1
  • Device Damaged Prior to Use1
  • Device Handling Problem1
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1
  • Scratched Material1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient3
  • Urinary Tract Infection2
  • Discomfort1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • Pain1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 7, 2020Device Handling Problem; Device Handling Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT RAN OUT OF SUPPLIES AND REUSED THE SAME CATHETER MULTIPLE TIMES WHICH RESULTED IN A URINARY TRACT INFECTION. IT IS UNKNOWN WHAT MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS PROVIDED FOR THE URINARY TRACT INFECTION.

    Patient problems: Urinary Tract Infection

    MAUDE report 10960674 ↗
  • InjuryOct 12, 2020Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD URINARY TRACT INFECTION AND FELT THAT IT MIGHT BE BECAUSE OF THE CATHETERS. ALSO, STATED THE PATIENT HAD ISSUES WITH THE INSERTION. PER FOLLOW UP, THE CUSTOMER NOTED THAT THE INFECTION WAS TREATED WITH PRESCRIBED ANTIBIOTICS AND THE CATHETERS WERE DIFFICULT TO INSERT, BUT THE PATIENT WAS STILL ABLE TO USE THEM.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 10667195 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 2, 2020Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE 50 CLEAN CATH CATHETERS WERE BENT OR DEFECTIVE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 10483462 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 3, 2020Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETERS WERE BENT LIKE A CIRCLE/MOON SHAPE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9547137 ↗
  • InjuryJul 18, 2019Difficult to Insert

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE VINYL CATHETER WAS DIFFICULT TO INSERT. THE PATIENT DEVELOPED A URINARY TRACT INFECTION; TREATMENT PROVIDED IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Urinary Tract Infection

    MAUDE report 8802371 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 27, 2018Device Damaged Prior to Use; Device Damaged Prior to Use; Scratched Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURFACE OF THE VINYL CATHETER FELT ROUGH AND SEEMED TO SCRATCH UPON INSERTION. THE PATIENT ALLEGEDLY EXPERIENCED PAIN AND DISCOMFORT. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Discomfort; Pain

    MAUDE report 8201473 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 7, 2018Break; Break; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PART OF THE CATHETER WAS CUT OFF.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8047547 ↗

Other CATHETER, UROLOGICAL devices

All CATHETER, UROLOGICAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page