Bard® Suction Catheter Two Eye, Whistle Tip With Control Vent 0360100Recalls & reported problems
C. R. Bard, Inc. · Bard® Suction Catheter Two Eye, Whistle Tip With Control Vent · Class 1
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741052453), received between Dec 5, 2018 and May 29, 2019 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure of Device to Self-Test” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure of Device to Self-Test1
- Incorrect Measurement1
- Material Integrity Problem1
- Material Twisted/Bent1
- Nonstandard Device1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient3
- No Patient Involvement3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 29, 2019Material Twisted/Bent
IT WAS REPORTED THAT 14 CATHETERS WERE BENT IN THE PACKAGING.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient; No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8651480 ↗MalfunctionDec 5, 2018Incorrect Measurement; Incorrect Measurement; Failure of Device to Self-Test
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PLASTIC SUCTION CATHETER FAILED DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS. THE PRODUCT WAS DETAINED AT THE BORDER BY FDA CUSTOMS WHERE IT WAS RANDOMLY SELECTED TO BE SAMPLED AND SENT TO AN FDA SELECTED LABORATORY FOR INSPECTION.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient; No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8134783 ↗MalfunctionDec 5, 2018Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PLASTIC SUCTION CATHETER FAILED VISUAL ANALYSIS. THE PRODUCT WAS DETAINED AT THE BORDER BY FDA CUSTOMS WHERE IT WAS RANDOMLY SELECTED TO BE SAMPLED AND SENT TO AN FDA SELECTED LABORATORY FOR INSPECTION.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient; No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8134780 ↗
Other CATHETERS, SUCTION, TRACHEOBRONCHIAL devices
- Ballard* Closed Suction System 93826Avanos Medical, Inc. · CATHETERS, SUCTION, TRACHEOBRONCHIAL1 recall70 reports
- Ballard* Closed Suction System 92431Avanos Medical, Inc. · CATHETERS, SUCTION, TRACHEOBRONCHIAL78 reports
- Ballard* Turbo-Cleaning Closed Suction System 98965Avanos Medical, Inc. · CATHETERS, SUCTION, TRACHEOBRONCHIAL1 recall16 reports
- Medline DYNCPDS14Medline Industries, Inc. · CATHETERS, SUCTION, TRACHEOBRONCHIAL1 recall16 reports
- Ballard* Turbo-Cleaning Closed Suction System 98263Avanos Medical, Inc. · CATHETERS, SUCTION, TRACHEOBRONCHIAL1 recall11 reports
- Ballard* Closed Suction System for Adults 98310Avanos Medical, Inc. · CATHETERS, SUCTION, TRACHEOBRONCHIAL1 recall1 death9 reports
- Medline DYNCPTP14TMedline Industries, Inc. · CATHETERS, SUCTION, TRACHEOBRONCHIAL1 recall6 reports
- Medline DYNCPTP14Medline Industries, Inc. · CATHETERS, SUCTION, TRACHEOBRONCHIAL1 recall4 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page