Skip to content

Vaccess® VA8068Recalls & reported problems

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · Vaccess® PTA Dilatation Catheter 6 mm x 80 mm, 80 cm Catheter · Class 2

All models of Vaccess (25)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741059896), received between Feb 18, 2025 and Oct 16, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Rupture2
  • Difficult to Remove1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 16, 2025Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    ON (B)(6) 2025, A 67-YR OLD FEMALE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE USING THE VACCESS PTA BALLOON. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PTA BALLOON WAS ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23307119 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 16, 2025Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove

    A 67-YEAR-OLD MALE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE IN THE RADIAL ARTERY USING THE VACCESS PTA BALLOON FOR A POORLY MATURING FISTULA. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON ALLEGEDLY REMAINS STUCK INSIDE THE SHEATH. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23060719 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 18, 2025Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE PTA BALLOON ALLEGEDLY DID NOT INFLATE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON HAD A SMALL PINHOLE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21393182 ↗

Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices

All CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page