Skip to content

Magic3™ Intermittent Catheter with Sure-Grip™ Sleeve 53620GRecalls & reported problems

C. R. Bard, Inc. · Magic3™ Intermittent Catheter with Sure-Grip™ Sleeve Hydrophilic Coated Silicone, Male · Class 2

All models of Magic3 Intermittent Catheter with Sure-Grip Sleeve (14)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741069802), received between Oct 25, 2017 and Sep 24, 2021 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Product Quality Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Product Quality Problem2
  • Difficult to Insert1
  • Improper Chemical Reaction1
  • Nonstandard Device1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Information1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 24, 2021Improper Chemical Reaction; Improper Chemical Reaction

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE LUBRICATION WAS TOO WATERY AND WOULD NOT LUBRICATE THE MAGIC3 CATHETER ENOUGH. THE REPRESENTATIVE ADVISED THE PATIENT THAT THEY COULD USE ADDITIONAL LUBE FOR THE CATHETERS. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD BEEN USING THE PRODUCTS FOR MORE THAN 90 DAYS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12525589 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 31, 2018Product Quality Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER HAD A LACK OF LUBRICITY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8024355 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 31, 2018Product Quality Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER LACKED LUBRICITY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Information

    MAUDE report 8023425 ↗
  • InjuryOct 25, 2017Difficult to Insert; Nonstandard Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER LACKED LUBRICITY. THE PATIENT DEVELOPED A URINARY TRACT INFECTION AFTER USING THE CATHETER.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 6975595 ↗

Other CATHETER, UROLOGICAL devices

All CATHETER, UROLOGICAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page