Skip to content

Pop-On™ Self-Adhering Male External Catheter 32303Recalls & reported problems

C. R. Bard, Inc. · Pop-On™ Self-Adhering Male External Catheter · Class 1

All models of Pop-On Self-Adhering Male External Catheter (9)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741070563), received between Apr 2, 2020 and Mar 25, 2021 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Nonstandard Device” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Nonstandard Device2
  • Backflow1
  • Biocompatibility1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • Skin Inflammation/ Irritation1
  • Unspecified Infection1
  • Urinary Tract Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 25, 2021Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER GOT STUCK ON AND IT WAS VERY HARD TO COME OFF WHICH CAUSED AN IRRITATION TO PATIENT'S SKIN. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Skin Inflammation/ Irritation

    MAUDE report 11569333 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 8, 2020Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT SAID THAT MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER ORDER HAD TOO MUCH ADHESIVE IN THE LAST BOX.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10972415 ↗
  • InjuryApr 2, 2020Backflow; Biocompatibility; Biocompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT ENDED UP WITH AN INFECTION DUE TO URINE THAT BACKED UP INTO THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection; Urinary Tract Infection

    MAUDE report 9918357 ↗

Other DEVICE, INCONTINENCE, UROSHEATH TYPE, NON-STERILE devices

All DEVICE, INCONTINENCE, UROSHEATH TYPE, NON-STERILE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page