UltraFlex™ Self-Adhering Male External Catheter 33103Recalls & reported problems
C. R. Bard, Inc. · UltraFlex™ Self-Adhering Male External Catheter · Class 1
All models of UltraFlex Self-Adhering Male External Catheter (9)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 20
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 20 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741070686), received between Apr 25, 2017 and Jan 3, 2023 — classified as 1 injury, 19 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Nonstandard Device” (15 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Nonstandard Device15
- Difficult to Remove5
- Material Integrity Problem3
- Sharp Edges3
- Physical Resistance/Sticking2
- Defective Device1
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient9
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient6
- Skin Tears6
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available4
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- No Code Available3
- Pain3
- No Information2
Recent adverse event reports
The 20 most recent of 20 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 3, 2023Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETERS WERE STICKY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16086164 ↗MalfunctionMar 24, 2022Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CUSTOMER WAS TRYING OUT MALE EXTERNAL CATHETERS AND HAVE TRIED TWO TYPES BUT BOTH WERE INCONSISTENTLY STAYING IN PLACE THROUGH THE NIGHT. CUSTOMER MENTIONED THAT THEY HAVE STAYED ON 2 OUT OF 5 NIGHTS (LOT: JUFV2649 & LOT: JUFX2803). INQUIRER REVIEWED THE DIRECTION FOR USE WITH THE CUSTOMER AND FOUND THAT THEY WERE APPROPRIATELY APPLYING THE CATHETER. CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THEY CLEANED THE PENIS WITH SOAP AND WATER, THOROUGHLY DRIED IT AND APPLIED THE CATHETER SO THAT IT HAD A LIMITED NUMBER OF WRINKLES AND TRIED TO SQUEEZE IT SO THAT THE ADHESIVE STUCK TO THE SKIN. CUSTOMER ALSO REPORTED THAT THE LARGER OF THE TWO CATHETERS SEEMED TO FIT THE PATIENT BETTER BUT SAID THAT IT EVEN CAME OFF AND ALSO NOTED THAT SOME CATHETERS SEEMED TO BE MORE STICKY THAN OTHERS (LOT: JUFV2649 & LOT: JUFX2803).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13873490 ↗MalfunctionMar 24, 2022Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CUSTOMER WAS TRYING OUT MALE EXTERNAL CATHETERS AND HAVE TRIED TWO TYPES BUT BOTH WERE INCONSISTENTLY STAYING IN PLACE THROUGH THE NIGHT. CUSTOMER MENTIONED THAT THEY HAVE STAYED ON 2 OUT OF 5 NIGHTS (LOT: JUFV2649 & LOT: JUFX2803). INQUIRER REVIEWED THE DIRECTION FOR USE WITH THE CUSTOMER AND FOUND THAT THEY WERE APPROPRIATELY APPLYING THE CATHETER. CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THEY CLEANED THE PENIS WITH SOAP AND WATER, THOROUGHLY DRIED IT AND APPLIED THE CATHETER SO THAT IT HAD A LIMITED NUMBER OF WRINKLES AND TRIED TO SQUEEZE IT SO THAT THE ADHESIVE STUCK TO THE SKIN. CUSTOMER ALSO REPORTED THAT THE LARGER OF THE TWO CATHETERS SEEMED TO FIT THE PATIENT BETTER BUT SAID THAT IT EVEN CAME OFF AND ALSO NOTED THAT SOME CATHETERS SEEMED TO BE MORE STICKY THAN OTHERS (LOT: JUFV2649 & LOT: JUFX2803).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13872392 ↗MalfunctionNov 30, 2021Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ADHESIVE ON THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER WAS PULLING OFF THE SKIN WHEN THE CUSTOMER WAS REMOVING THE CATHETER.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Skin Tears
MAUDE report 12899738 ↗MalfunctionDec 7, 2020Sharp Edges; Sharp Edges
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED CUTS IN SKIN WHICH CAUSED PAIN AND BLEED BECAUSE OF THE SHARP PLASTIC.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; No Code Available; Pain; Skin Tears
MAUDE report 10962810 ↗MalfunctionDec 7, 2020Sharp Edges; Sharp Edges
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED CUTS IN SKIN WHICH CAUSED PAIN AND BLEED BECAUSE OF THE SHARP PLASTIC. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; No Code Available; Pain; Skin Tears
MAUDE report 10962773 ↗MalfunctionDec 7, 2020Sharp Edges; Sharp Edges
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED CUTS IN SKIN WHICH CAUSED PAIN AND BLEED BECAUSE OF THE SHARP PLASTIC.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; No Code Available; Pain; Skin Tears
MAUDE report 10962692 ↗MalfunctionMay 26, 2020Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device; Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CUSTOMER USED THE ULTRAFLEX PRODUCT, AND STATED THAT IT REMOVED SKIN. PER FOLLOW UP, THE CUSTOMER REMOVED THE CATHETER IN THE SHOWER, AND SAID THERE WAS STILL GLUE REMAINING.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; Skin Tears
MAUDE report 10089759 ↗MalfunctionJul 3, 2019Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device; Defective Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ADHESIVE WAS TOO STRONG AND AS A RESULT THE PATIENT COULD NOT USE THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETERS. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient; No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8757814 ↗MalfunctionJun 6, 2019Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER HAD TOO STRONG OF AN ADHESIVE. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8674790 ↗MalfunctionMay 28, 2019Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER HAD TOO STRONG OF AN ADHESIVE. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8645616 ↗MalfunctionMar 14, 2019Nonstandard Device; Material Integrity Problem; Nonstandard Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER (MEC) HAD TOO STRONG OF AN ADHESIVE. THE PATIENT ALLEGEDLY EXPERIENCED SKIN TEARING. THERE WAS NO REPORTED MEDICAL INTERVENTION.
Patient problems: Skin Tears
MAUDE report 8420086 ↗MalfunctionOct 11, 2018Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device; Difficult to Remove
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER WAS DIFFICULT TO REMOVE BECAUSE THE ADHESIVE WAS TOO STRONG. THE COMPLAINANT REPORTED IT TOOK ABOUT 15 MINUTES FOR HIM TO REMOVE THE CATHETER.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7957311 ↗MalfunctionSep 11, 2018Nonstandard Device; Difficult to Remove; Nonstandard Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ADHESIVE OF THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER WAS TOO STRONG, MAKING THE CATHETER DIFFICULT TO REMOVE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7864367 ↗MalfunctionSep 11, 2018Nonstandard Device; Difficult to Remove; Nonstandard Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ADHESIVE OF THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER WAS TOO STRONG, MAKING THE CATHETER DIFFICULT TO REMOVE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Information
MAUDE report 7864362 ↗MalfunctionAug 27, 2018Nonstandard Device; Difficult to Remove; Nonstandard Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ADHESIVE OF THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER WAS TOO STRONG, MAKING THE CATHETERS DIFFICULT TO REMOVE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7820782 ↗MalfunctionAug 22, 2018Nonstandard Device; Material Integrity Problem; Nonstandard Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER WAS DIFFICULT TO UNROLL.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7804296 ↗MalfunctionJul 25, 2018Nonstandard Device; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Nonstandard Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ADHESIVE ON THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER WAS REMAINING ON THE PATIENTS SKIN AFTER REMOVAL.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7719645 ↗MalfunctionMay 10, 2017Difficult to Remove; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER WAS TOO TIGHT AND DIFFICULT TO REMOVE. THE PATIENT STATES THAT HE WAS NEVER MEASURED FOR THE CATHETER AND WILL TRY A SIZE BIGGER.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 6556847 ↗InjuryApr 25, 2017Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT DEVELOPED SORES ON HIS PENIS.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 6518803 ↗
Other DEVICE, INCONTINENCE, UROSHEATH TYPE, NON-STERILE devices
- Spirit® Hydrocolloid Adhesive Sheath 39302C. R. Bard, Inc. · DEVICE, INCONTINENCE, UROSHEATH TYPE, NON-STERILE48 reports
- Spirit® Hydrocolloid Adhesive Sheath 39303C. R. Bard, Inc. · DEVICE, INCONTINENCE, UROSHEATH TYPE, NON-STERILE42 reports
- Spirit® Hydrocolloid Adhesive Sheath 35302C. R. Bard, Inc. · DEVICE, INCONTINENCE, UROSHEATH TYPE, NON-STERILE36 reports
- Spirit® Hydrocolloid Adhesive Sheath 35303C. R. Bard, Inc. · DEVICE, INCONTINENCE, UROSHEATH TYPE, NON-STERILE32 reports
- UltraFlex™ Self-Adhering Male External Catheter 33302C. R. Bard, Inc. · DEVICE, INCONTINENCE, UROSHEATH TYPE, NON-STERILE31 reports
- Spirit® Hydrocolloid Adhesive Sheath 39304C. R. Bard, Inc. · DEVICE, INCONTINENCE, UROSHEATH TYPE, NON-STERILE29 reports
- Wideband™ Self-Adhering Male External Catheter 36302C. R. Bard, Inc. · DEVICE, INCONTINENCE, UROSHEATH TYPE, NON-STERILE29 reports
- Spirit® Hydrocolloid Adhesive Sheath 35304C. R. Bard, Inc. · DEVICE, INCONTINENCE, UROSHEATH TYPE, NON-STERILE25 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page