Skip to content

UltraFlex™ Self-Adhering Male External Catheter 33304Recalls & reported problems

C. R. Bard, Inc. · UltraFlex™ Self-Adhering Male External Catheter · Class 1

All models of UltraFlex Self-Adhering Male External Catheter (9)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741070792), received between May 27, 2020 and Jul 2, 2020 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Nonstandard Device” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Nonstandard Device3
  • Defective Device1
  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
  • Product Quality Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 2, 2020Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device; Product Quality Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER HAD ADHESIVE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 10224236 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 5, 2020Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device; Defective Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETERS WERE FOUND DEFECTIVE AND HAD ADHESION ALL OVER THEM. TWO PRODUCTS WERE ALLEGED 33304 AND 33305.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 10122449 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 27, 2020Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE EXTERNALS LEFT A RESIDUE BEHIND WHEN REMOVED. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 10091596 ↗

Other DEVICE, INCONTINENCE, UROSHEATH TYPE, NON-STERILE devices

All DEVICE, INCONTINENCE, UROSHEATH TYPE, NON-STERILE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page