Skip to content

Spirit® Hydrocolloid Adhesive Sheath 37103Recalls & reported problems

C. R. Bard, Inc. · Spirit® Hydrocolloid Adhesive Sheath · Class 1

All models of Spirit Hydrocolloid Adhesive Sheath (28)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741071140), received between Apr 26, 2017 and Sep 25, 2018 — classified as 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Remove4
  • Nonstandard Device2
  • Device Operates Differently Than Expected1
  • Material Deformation1
  • Material Integrity Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient4
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • No Information1
  • Patient Problem/Medical Problem1
  • Skin Irritation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 25, 2018Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER WAS KNOTTED AT THE END.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7906612 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 27, 2018Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device; Difficult to Remove; Device Operates Differently Than Expected

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ADHESIVE ON THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER WAS TOO STRONG, AND MADE IT DIFFICULT TO REMOVE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Information

    MAUDE report 7372778 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 23, 2018Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device; Material Integrity Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ADHESIVE OF THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER WAS TOO STRONG AND THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED SELF-LIMITED BLEEDING. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient; Patient Problem/Medical Problem

    MAUDE report 7367371 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 18, 2017Difficult to Remove

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER WAS DIFFICULT TO REMOVE, ALLEGEDLY DUE TO EXCESSIVE ADHESIVE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6576902 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 2, 2017Difficult to Remove

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ADHESIVE WAS VERY STRONG MAKING THE CATHETER DIFFICULT TO REMOVE. IT ALLEGEDLY TOOK THE COMPLAINANT 20 MINUTES TO REMOVE THE CATHETER FROM THE PATIENT'S PENIS; HOWEVER, NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6536830 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 26, 2017Difficult to Remove

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER WAS DIFFICULT TO REMOVE FROM THE PATIENT'S SKIN CAUSING SOME RED SPOTS DUE TO "TUGGING" THE CATHETER OFF. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED.

    Patient problems: Skin Irritation

    MAUDE report 6524837 ↗

Other DEVICE, INCONTINENCE, UROSHEATH TYPE, NON-STERILE devices

All DEVICE, INCONTINENCE, UROSHEATH TYPE, NON-STERILE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page