Skip to content

Spirit® Hydrocolloid Adhesive Sheath 39305Recalls & reported problems

C. R. Bard, Inc. · Spirit® Hydrocolloid Adhesive Sheath · Class 1

All models of Spirit Hydrocolloid Adhesive Sheath (28)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741071362), received between Sep 30, 2019 and Jun 25, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries, 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Nonstandard Device” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Nonstandard Device5
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem2
  • Biocompatibility1
  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Patient-Device Incompatibility1

Patient problems

  • Skin Inflammation/ Irritation2
  • Skin Tears2
  • Urinary Tract Infection2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Reaction1
  • Tissue Breakdown1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 25, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT OVER THE LAST EIGHT MONTHS DEVELOPED SKIN IRRITATION. DID CONSULTED PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIAN WHO PRESCRIBED MEDICATION.

    Patient problems: Skin Inflammation/ Irritation; Tissue Breakdown; Urinary Tract Infection

    MAUDE report 22331771 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 27, 2023Nonstandard Device; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Nonstandard Device; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT FELT A LAYER OF SKIN WAS COMING OFF TOO ,WHEN THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER TOOK IT OFF FROM PENIS. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Skin Tears

    MAUDE report 16443171 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 30, 2022Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER WAS HARD TO REMOVE DUE TO ALL THE ADHESIVE THAT RUNS THROUGH THE SHEATH. THEY STATED THAT IT SOMETIMES TAKES THE SKIN OFF THE BOTTOM OF THEIR PENIS. PER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA LIBERATOR ON 14-NOV-2022, STATED THAT THESE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETERS PULL AT SKIN AND MADE IT SORENESS TO THE PATIENT. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Skin Inflammation/ Irritation

    MAUDE report 15887786 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 23, 2022Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER WAS HARD TO REMOVE DUE TO ALL THE ADHESIVE THAT RUNS THOUGH THE SHEATH. THEY STATED THAT IT SOMETIMES TAKES THE SKIN OFF THE BOTTOM OF THEIR PENIS. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Skin Tears

    MAUDE report 15469493 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 28, 2022Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ADHESION IN THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER WAS REALLY STRONG. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13620810 ↗
  • InjuryDec 30, 2021Biocompatibility; Biocompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DOCTOR ADVISED THE PATIENT THAT THE URINARY TRACT INFECTION MIGHT BE DUE TO THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER. IT WAS UNKNOWN THAT WHAT MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS PROVIDED FOR THE URINARY TRACT INFECTION.

    Patient problems: Urinary Tract Infection

    MAUDE report 13119161 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 28, 2020Patient-Device Incompatibility; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Patient-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MALE EXTERNAL CATHETER CAUSED THE PATIENT TO BREAK OUT AND GAVE HIM AN INFECTION.

    Patient problems: Reaction; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 9769588 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 30, 2019Nonstandard Device; Difficult to Remove; Nonstandard Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MECS ADHESIVE WAS TOO STRONG, WHICH MADE THEM DIFFICULT TO REMOVE. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9134436 ↗

Other DEVICE, INCONTINENCE, UROSHEATH TYPE, NON-STERILE devices

All DEVICE, INCONTINENCE, UROSHEATH TYPE, NON-STERILE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page