LUTONIX® Drug Coated Balloon LX351006150Recalls & reported problems
Lutonix, Inc. · LUTONIX® 035 Drug Coated Balloon PTA Catheter .035" 100cm 6x150mm · Class 3
All models of LUTONIX Drug Coated Balloon (107)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 7
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741088483), received between Apr 7, 2016 and Sep 8, 2017 — classified as 7 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem7
- Material Rupture1
Patient problems
- Reocclusion7
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 8, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THREE LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETERS WERE USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE LEFT PROXIMAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 17 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S LEFT PROXIMAL SFA VASCULATURE WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED AND THE HCP DEEMED IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS DEFINITELY RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE, BUT NOT RELATED TO THE PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. THIS IS ONE OF THREE PRODUCTS INVOLVED WITH THE REPORTED EVENT AND THE ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURERS REPORT NUMBER ARE 3006513822-2017-00171 AND 3006513822-2017-00172.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 6853786 ↗InjurySep 8, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THREE LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETERS WERE USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE LEFT PROXIMAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 17 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S LEFT PROXIMAL SFA VASCULATURE WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED AND THE HCP DEEMED IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS DEFINITELY RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE, BUT NOT RELATED TO THE PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. THIS IS ONE OF THREE PRODUCTS INVOLVED WITH THE REPORTED EVENT AND THE ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURERS REPORT NUMBER ARE 3006513822-2017-00171 AND 3006513822-2017-00173.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 6853560 ↗InjuryApr 13, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, TWO LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETERS WERE USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 22 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S SFA VESSEL WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED INVOLVING A SFA-POPLITEAL ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT AND THE HCP DEEMED IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND NOT AVAILABLE FOR FURTHER EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. THIS IS ONE OF TWO PRODUCTS INVOLVED WITH THE REPORTED EVENT AND THE ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURERS REPORT NUMBER IS 3006513822-2017-00061.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 6488987 ↗InjuryNov 16, 2016Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETERS WAS USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE RIGHT MID-DISTAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 19 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT'S RIGHT MID-DISTAL SFA VESSEL WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED AND THE HCP DEEMED IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THE EVENT WAS UNLIKELY RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE AND NOT RELATED TO THE PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND NOT AVAILABLE FOR FURTHER EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. THIS IS ONE OF TWO PRODUCTS INVOLVED WITH THE REPORTED EVENT AND THE ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURERS REPORT NUMBER IS 3006513822-2016-00207.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 6108114 ↗InjuryMay 23, 2016Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, TWO LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WERE USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE RIGHT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 2 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE RIGHT SFA STENTED AREA WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A PERCUTANEOUS PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED AND THE HCP DEEMED IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE BUT IS DEFINITELY RELATED TO THE PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND NOT AVAILABLE FOR FURTHER EVALUATION. NOTE, THE LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER IS INDICATED FOR PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA), AFTER PRE-DILATATION OF DE NOVO OR RESTENOTIC LESIONS UP TO 150 MM IN LENGTH IN THE NATIVE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL OR POPLITEAL ARTERIES WITH REFERENCE VESSEL DIAMETERS OF 4-7 MM. THE LUTONIX DCB WAS USED TO TREAT THE STENTED LESION PER THE STUDY REQUIREMENTS. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. THIS IS ONE OF TWO PRODUCTS INVOLVED WITH THE REPORTED EVENT AND THE ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURERS REPORT NUMBERS ARE 3006513822-2016-00113.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 5673851 ↗MalfunctionApr 13, 2016Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER ALLEGEDLY EXPERIENCED A MATERIAL RUPTURE WHILE TREATING THE TARGET LESION DURING A (B)(4) STUDY. THE HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP) REPORTEDLY INFLATED THE LUTONIX DCB WITHIN THE LIFESTENT TO 8 ATMOSPHERES TO TREAT CALCIFICATION IN THE TARGET LESION. AFTER THE TREATMENT WAS COMPLETED, THE BALLOON ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED. AFTER SUCCESSFUL REMOVAL OF THE CATHETER, THE PHYSICIAN NOTED THE MATERIAL RUPTURE APPEARED TO BE A PINHOLE, AND BELIEVES THE RUPTURE WAS RELATED TO THE PATIENT'S PRE-EXISTING CALCIFIED LESION. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS DEVICE IS MARKETED IN THE UNITED STATES (US); HOWEVER, THE US INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU) STATES THIS DEVICE IS INDICATED TO BE USED IN DE NOVO LESIONS UP TO 15.0 CM IN LENGTH. THIS EVENT IS BEING REPORTED ONLY AS A MALFUNCTION BECAUSE OF THE SIMILAR DEVICE REQUIREMENT IN 21CFR803.50, WHICH IS LIMITED TO MALFUNCTIONS. THE LUTONIX DCB WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY. NO SUBSEQUENT ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 5574846 ↗InjuryApr 7, 2016Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THREE LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETERS WERE USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE RIGHT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 5 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT'S RIGHT SFA VESSEL WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED INVOLVING PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) WITH STENTING AND THE HCP DEEMED IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND NOT AVAILABLE FOR FURTHER EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. THIS IS ONE OF THREE PRODUCTS INVOLVED WITH THE REPORTED EVENT AND ARE ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURERS REPORT NUMBERS 3006513822-2016-00080 AND 3006513822-2016-00082.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 5555452 ↗InjuryApr 7, 2016Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THREE LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WERE USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE RIGHT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 5 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S RIGHT SFA VESSEL WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED INVOLVING PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) WITH STENTING AND THE HCP DEEMED IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE, DRUG OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND NOT AVAILABLE FOR FURTHER EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. THIS IS ONE OF THREE PRODUCTS INVOLVED WITH THE REPORTED EVENT AND ARE ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURERS REPORT NUMBERS 3006513822-2016-00081 AND 3006513822-2016-00082. THE INDEPENDENT CEC EVALUATORS HAVE ADJUDICATED THE PREVIOUSLY REPORTED EVENT AS POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE AND PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 5555408 ↗
Other Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter devices
- LUTONIX® Drug Coated Balloon LX351305150Lutonix, Inc. · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter117 reports
- LUTONIX® Drug Coated Balloon LX351306150Lutonix, Inc. · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter75 reports
- Ranger™ H74939419502010Boston Scientific Corporation · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter71 reports
- Ranger™ H74939419602010Boston Scientific Corporation · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter71 reports
- Lutonix® Drug Coated Balloon LX351305100Lutonix, Inc. · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter66 reports
- IN.PACT™ Admiral™ ADM06004013PMedtronic, Inc. · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter1 recall12 reports
- IN.PACT™ Admiral™ ADM06015013PMedtronic, Inc. · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter1 recall11 reports
- IN.PACT™ Admiral™ ADM04015013PMedtronic, Inc. · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter1 recall8 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page