Lutonix® Drug Coated Balloon LX35130560Recalls & reported problems
Lutonix, Inc. · LUTONIX® 035 Drug Coated Balloon PTA Catheter .035 130cm 5x60mm · Class 3
All models of LUTONIX Drug Coated Balloon (107)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Lutonix drug-coated balloon catheter is used to open narrowed arteries in the legs. The 45 reports mostly describe the treated leg arteries closing back up again months after the procedure, sometimes with clot or renewed leg pain, requiring repeat treatment; one report mentions the balloon material tearing. No deaths were reported, and 44 injuries were. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 45
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 44
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 45 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741088599), received between Mar 18, 2016 and Feb 28, 2019 — classified as 44 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem44
- Material Rupture1
- Occlusion Within Device1
Patient problems
- Reocclusion43
- Claudication5
- Thrombosis5
- Pain2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Patient Involvement1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 45 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 28, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE REINTERVENTION PROCEDURE, A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE RIGHT POPLITEAL ARTERY. APPROXIMATELY 23 MONTHS AFTER THE REINTERVENTION PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S RIGHT POPLITEAL VESSEL WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. ON (B)(6) 2019, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A TARGET LESION REINTERVENTION WHICH THE HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP) DEEMED SUCCESSFUL. REPORTEDLY, THE LOT NUMBER DURING THE PROCEDURE WAS NOT AVAILABLE WHEN REQUESTED FROM THE USER FACILITY. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE LUTONIX DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR FURTHER EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 8380389 ↗InjuryDec 21, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THREE LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETERS WERE USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESIONS LOCATED IN THE LEFT PROXIMAL-MID SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) AND LEFT PROXIMAL POPLITEAL ARTERY. APPROXIMATELY 13 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S TARGET LESIONS WERE REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED VIA DUPLEX ULTRASOUND (DUS) IMAGING. HOWEVER, THE REGISTRY'S INDEPENDENT EVALUATOR'S ASSESSED ONLY THE LEFT MID-DISTAL SFA, INCLUDES TARGET LESION 2 ONLY, TO BE 50-99% OCCLUDED AT THIS TIME. NO REVASCULARIZATION HAS BEEN PERFORMED ON TARGET LESION 1, PROXIMAL POPLITEAL, OR TARGET LESION 2, MID SFA. APPROXIMATELY 35 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED ON TARGET LESION 3, LEFT PROXIMAL SFA. THE HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP) DEEMED THE REVASCULARIZATION SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICES OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLES WERE DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 8190874 ↗InjuryDec 18, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE LEFT POPLITEAL ARTERY. THE PATIENT DEVELOPED REOCCLUSION IN APPROXIMATELY 35 MONTHS AFTER INDEX PROCEDURE, AS A RESULT OF THE PATIENT UNDERWENT DIAGNOSTIC TESTING. A REINTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED AND THE HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP) DEEMED IT SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR FURTHER EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 8177406 ↗InjuryNov 5, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, TWO LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETERS WERE USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESIONS LOCATED IN THE RIGHT DISTAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) AND RIGHT POPLITEAL ARTERY. APPROXIMATELY 18 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S RIGHT SFA VASCULATURE AND POPLITEAL VASCULATURE WERE REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED VIA DUPLEX ULTRASOUND (DUS) IMAGING. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED AND THE HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP) DEEMED IT SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICES OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLES WERE DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. THIS IS ONE OF TWO PRODUCTS INVOLVED WITH THE REPORTED EVENT AND THE ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURER¿S REPORT NUMBER IS 3006513822-2018-00251.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 8038651 ↗InjuryNov 2, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE LEFT POPLITEAL ARTERY. APPROXIMATELY 13 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE CLINICAL REGISTRY'S INDEPENDENT EVALUATOR ASSESSED THE PATIENT¿S LEFT POPLITEAL VESSEL WAS REPORTEDLY OCCLUDED VIA DUPLEX ULTRASOUND (DUS) IMAGING. APPROXIMATELY 24 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED. THE HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP) DEEMED THE REINTERVENTION SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR FURTHER EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 8035044 ↗InjurySep 24, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION IN THE DISTAL RIGHT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 23 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S RIGHT DISTAL SFA VASCULATURE WAS REPORTED TO HAVE NO FLOW DURING THE PATIENT'S 2 YEAR FOLLOW-UP AND COMPLAINTS OF PROGRESSIVE CLAUDICATION. NO ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION HAS BEEN PERFORMED AT THIS TIME. NO ADDITIONAL SURGICAL INTERVENTION HAS BEEN PERFORMED AT THIS TIME, BUT THE HCP DID RECOMMENDED CONTINUED ANTI-PLATELET THERAPY WITH FOLLOW UP VISITS. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS PROBABLY RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Claudication; Reocclusion
MAUDE report 7902745 ↗InjuryAug 22, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THREE LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETERS WERE USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE LEFT MID SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 12 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S LEFT MID SFA VASCULATURE WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. NO ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION HAS BEEN PERFORMED AT THIS TIME. SUBSEQUENTLY, 3 MONTHS LATER THE HCP PERFORMED A TARGET LESION REINTERVENTION AND DEEMED THE PROCEDURE SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR REASSESSED THIS EVENT WAS POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE, BUT NOT RELATED TO THE PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND NOT AVAILABLE FOR FURTHER EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. THIS IS ONE OF THREE PRODUCTS INVOLVED WITH THE REPORTED EVENT AND THE ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURER¿S REPORT NUMBERS ARE 3006513822-2018-00180 AND 3006513822-2018-00181.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 7806475 ↗InjuryAug 22, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THREE LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETERS WERE USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE LEFT MID SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 12 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S LEFT MID SFA VASCULATURE WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. NO ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION HAS BEEN PERFORMED AT THIS TIME. SUBSEQUENTLY, 3 MONTHS LATER THE HCP PERFORMED A TARGET LESION REINTERVENTION AND DEEMED THE PROCEDURE SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR REASSESSED THIS EVENT WAS POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE, BUT NOT RELATED TO THE PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND NOT AVAILABLE FOR FURTHER EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. THIS IS ONE OF THREE PRODUCTS INVOLVED WITH THE REPORTED EVENT AND THE ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURER¿S REPORT NUMBERS ARE 3006513822-2018-00181 AND 3006513822-2018-00182.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 7805356 ↗InjuryMay 4, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE LEFT DISTAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 11 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S LEFT SFA WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. THE PATIENT WAS RECOMMENDED TO CONTINUE ANTI-PLATELET THERAPY AND NO ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION HAS BEEN PERFORMED AT THIS TIME. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR FURTHER EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 7486771 ↗InjuryApr 2, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE LEFT POPLITEAL ARTERY. APPROXIMATELY 15 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S LEFT POPLITEAL ARTERY WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED AND THE HCP DEEMED IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. THIS IS ONE OF TWO PRODUCTS INVOLVED WITH THE REPORTED EVENT AND THE ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURER¿S REPORT NUMBER IS 3006513822-2018-00073.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 7390149 ↗InjuryMar 28, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE LEFT MID SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 11 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S LEFT SFA VASCULATURE WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. THE PATIENT WAS HOSPITALIZED, AND A REINTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED VIA PLACEMENT OF A STENT AT THE TARGET LESION. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR FURTHER EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 7379495 ↗InjuryMar 2, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE RIGHT PROXIMAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 16 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S RIGHT SFA VESSEL WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED AND THE HCP DEEMED IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 7310711 ↗InjuryMar 2, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE RIGHT PROXIMAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 28 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S RIGHT SFA VESSEL WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. AN INTERVENTION VIA BYPASS GRAFT WAS PERFORMED AND THE HCP DEEMED IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 7309618 ↗InjuryJan 23, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE LEFT DISTAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 17 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT REPORTEDLY EXPERIENCED SYMPTOMS OF CLAUDICATION AND LOWER LIMB PAIN, DUE TO REOCCLUSION OF THE TARGET LESION. A REINTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED INVOLVING THE PLACEMENT OF A STENT. THE HCP DEEMED THE REINTERVENTION SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR FURTHER EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Claudication; Pain; Reocclusion
MAUDE report 7213519 ↗InjuryJan 22, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE LEFT MID SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 12 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S LEFT MID SFA VESSEL WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. THE PATIENT WAS PLACED ON A CONSERVATIVE MEDICATION REGIMENT AND NO ADDITIONAL INTERVENTIONS HAVE BEEN PERFORMED AT THIS TIME. THE INVESTIGATOR REASSESSED AS NOT RELATED TO INDEX PROCEDURE , AND THE STUDY DEVICE; THEREFORE, THE EVENT HAS BEEN DELETED. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR FURTHER EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 7209550 ↗InjuryNov 30, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE LEFT MID THIRD OF THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 13 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S LEFT SFA VESSEL WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED AND THE HCP DEEMED IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 7069933 ↗InjuryNov 15, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE RIGHT POPLITEAL ARTERY. APPROXIMATELY 9 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S POPLITEAL VESSEL WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED AND THE HCP DEEMED IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 7033556 ↗InjuryNov 3, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, TWO LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETERS WERE USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE LEFT MID SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) AND POPLITEAL ARTERY. APPROXIMATELY 1 MONTH AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT HAD A DUPLEX ULTRASOUND WHICH REVEALED THE PATIENT¿S RIGHT LEFT MID SFA AND POPLITEAL VASCULATURE CONTAINING THE TARGET LESION WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. THE HCP ELECTED A CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE PATIENT. ON (B)(6) 2017, THE PATIENT PRESENTED TO THE OFFICE WITH BILATERAL CLAUDICATION IN BOTH CALVES. AT THAT TIME, THE HCP CONTINUED CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT OF THE PATIENT'S SYMPTOMS. THE PATIENT CALLED THE NURSE LINE ON (B)(6) 2017, DUE TO WORSENING LEG PAIN. APPROXIMATELY 20 MONTHS AFTER THE INITIAL REOCCLUSION OF THE PATIENT'S TREATED VASCULATURE, A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE REOCCLUSION EVENT NOTED ON (B)(6) 2017 WAS POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. THIS I
Patient problems: Claudication; Reocclusion
MAUDE report 7001520 ↗InjuryNov 2, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THREE LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETERS WERE USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE RIGHT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 7 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S RIGHT SFA VASCULATURE WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED AND THE HCP DEEMED IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLES WERE DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. THIS IS ONE OF THREE PRODUCTS INVOLVED WITH THE REPORTED EVENT AND THE ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURER¿S REPORT NUMBERS ARE 3006513822-2017-00274 AND 3006513822-2017-00275.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 6995790 ↗InjuryNov 1, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE LEFT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 9 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S LEFT SFA VASCULATURE WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED AT THIS TIME. AN ADDITIONAL REINTERVENTION OCCURRED TWO MONTHS LATER ON (B)(6) 2016. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 6993201 ↗InjuryOct 31, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THREE LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETERS WERE USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE LEFT MID SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) TO THE PROXIMAL POPLITEAL ARTERY. APPROXIMATELY 7 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S VESSEL CONTAINING THE TARGET LESION WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED AND THE HCP DEEMED IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICES OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLES WERE DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. THIS IS ONE OF THREE PRODUCTS INVOLVED WITH THE REPORTED EVENT AND THE ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURER¿S REPORT NUMBER ARE 3006513822-2017-00239 AND 3006513822-2017-00240.
Patient problems: Reocclusion; Thrombosis
MAUDE report 6992140 ↗InjuryOct 31, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THREE LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETERS WERE USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE LEFT MID SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) TO THE PROXIMAL POPLITEAL ARTERY. APPROXIMATELY 7 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S VESSEL CONTAINING THE TARGET LESION WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED AND THE HCP DEEMED IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICES OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLES WERE DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. THIS IS ONE OF THREE PRODUCTS INVOLVED WITH THE REPORTED EVENT AND THE ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURER¿S REPORT NUMBER ARE 3006513822-2017-00239 AND 3006513822-2017-00241.
Patient problems: Reocclusion; Thrombosis
MAUDE report 6991559 ↗InjuryOct 27, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THREE LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETERS WERE USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE RIGHT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 1 MONTH AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S ENTIRE RIGHT SFA VASCULATURE WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED AND THE HCP DEEMED IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. THIS IS ONE OF THREE PRODUCTS INVOLVED WITH THE REPORTED EVENT AND THE ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURER¿S REPORT NUMBERS ARE 3006513822-2017-00233 AND 3006513822-2017-00234.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 6985094 ↗InjurySep 26, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE LEFT PROXIMAL AND MID SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 27 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S LEFT PROXIMAL AND MID SFA VESSELS WERE REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED AND THE HCP DEEMED IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 6895573 ↗InjuryAug 15, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, TWO LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETERS WERE USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESIONS LOCATED IN THE PROXIMAL AND DISTAL THIRDS OF THE LEFT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 12 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S PROXIMAL AND DISTAL LEFT SFA VESSEL WERE REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED A FEW MONTHS LATER ON (B)(6) 2017 AND THE HCP DEEMED IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT PASSED AWAY FROM LUNG CANCER ON (B)(6) 2017. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. THIS IS ONE OF TWO PRODUCTS INVOLVED WITH THE REPORTED EVENT AND THE ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURERS REPORT NUMBER IS 3006513822-2017-00157.
Patient problems: Reocclusion
MAUDE report 6794620 ↗
Other Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter devices
- LUTONIX® Drug Coated Balloon LX351305150Lutonix, Inc. · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter117 reports
- LUTONIX® Drug Coated Balloon LX351306150Lutonix, Inc. · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter75 reports
- Ranger™ H74939419502010Boston Scientific Corporation · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter71 reports
- Ranger™ H74939419602010Boston Scientific Corporation · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter71 reports
- Lutonix® Drug Coated Balloon LX351305100Lutonix, Inc. · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter66 reports
- IN.PACT™ Admiral™ ADM06004013PMedtronic, Inc. · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter1 recall12 reports
- IN.PACT™ Admiral™ ADM06015013PMedtronic, Inc. · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter1 recall11 reports
- IN.PACT™ Admiral™ ADM04015013PMedtronic, Inc. · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter1 recall8 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page