Skip to content

LUTONIX® Drug Coated Balloon LX35755405FRecalls & reported problems

Lutonix, Inc. · LUTONIX® 035 Drug Coated Balloon PTA Catheter .035" 75cm 5x40mm 5 French · Class 3

All models of LUTONIX Drug Coated Balloon (107)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741122804), received between Mar 22, 2018 and Dec 28, 2018 — classified as 6 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem6

Patient problems

  • Reocclusion6

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 28, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A POST MARKET CLINICAL STUDY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE LEFT POPLITEAL ARTERY. APPROXIMATELY 8 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S LEFT POPLITEAL ARTERY WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED VIA DUPLEX ULTRASOUND (DUS) IMAGING. A REVASCULARIZATION HAS NOT BEEN PERFORMED AT THIS TIME. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE, BUT NOT RELATED TO THE PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Reocclusion

    MAUDE report 8204031 ↗
  • InjuryNov 21, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A POST MARKET CLINICAL STUDY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, TWO LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETERS WERE USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE RIGHT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 1 MONTH AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S RIGHT SFA WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. NO REVASCULARIZATION HAS BEEN PERFORMED AT THIS TIME. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICES, BUT NOT RELATED TO THE PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLES WERE DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. THIS IS ONE OF TWO PRODUCTS INVOLVED WITH THE REPORTED EVENT AND THE ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURER¿S REPORT NUMBER IS 3006513822-2018-00274.

    Patient problems: Reocclusion

    MAUDE report 8096542 ↗
  • InjuryOct 12, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A POST MARKET CLINICAL STUDY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, TWO LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETERS WERE USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE LEFT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 5 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S LEFT SFA WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED AND IT WAS DEEMED SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICES, BUT NOT RELATED TO THE PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLES WERE DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. THIS IS ONE OF TWO PRODUCTS INVOLVED WITH THE REPORTED EVENT AND THE ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURER¿S REPORT NUMBER IS 3006513822-2018-00224.

    Patient problems: Reocclusion

    MAUDE report 7962156 ↗
  • InjuryJun 27, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE JUXTA-ANASTOMOTIC SECTION OF THE LEFT CEPHALIC VEIN. APPROXIMATELY 3 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S TARGET LESION WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED VIA A BYPASS GRAFT AND THE HCP DEEMED IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE OR PROCEDURE, BUT DEFINITELY RELATED TO THE AV ACCESS CIRCUIT. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Reocclusion

    MAUDE report 7641342 ↗
  • InjuryMay 24, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING A REINTERVENTION, A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE LEFT CEPHALIC VEIN OUTFLOW. APPROXIMATELY 1 MONTH AFTER THE REINTERVENTION PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S VESSEL CONTAINING THE TARGET LESION WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED VIA SHUNT REVISION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A NEW SHUNT. THE HCP DEEMED THE CREATION OF THE NEW FISTULA SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE DEVICE, PROCEDURE, AND AV ACCESS CIRCUIT. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Reocclusion

    MAUDE report 7542551 ↗
  • InjuryMar 22, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE JUXTA ANASTOMOTIC REGION IN THE CEPHALIC VEIN OF THE LEFT FOREARM AV FISTULA. APPROXIMATELY 4 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S VESSEL CONTAINING THE TARGET LESION WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS ATTEMPTED, BUT THE GUIDEWIRE WOULD NOT PASS. THE HCP PROCEEDED TO ABANDON THE ACCESS SITE. THE HCP CREATED A NEW AV FISTULA THAT INCORPORATED THE TARGET LESION. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Reocclusion

    MAUDE report 7361568 ↗

Other Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter devices

All Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page