Skip to content

LUTONIX® Drug Coated Balloon LX351306405FRecalls & reported problems

Lutonix, Inc. · LUTONIX® 035 Drug Coated Balloon PTA Catheter .035" 130cm 6x40mm 5 French · Class 3

All models of LUTONIX Drug Coated Balloon (107)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741123252), received between Nov 21, 2018 and Sep 10, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Material Rupture3
  • Off-Label Use1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • Reocclusion2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Restenosis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 10, 2024Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE DRUG COATED BALLOON WAS ALLEGEDLY COULD NOT HOLD PRESSURE AS IF THERE WAS A HOLE IN IT OR THAT IT HAD BURST. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20179232 ↗
  • InjuryJul 7, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH RESULTS OF A CLINICAL TRIAL THAT FIVE MONTHS AND SIX DAYS POST INDEX PROCEDURE USING A DRUG-COATED BALLOON CATHETER, THE SUBJECT DEVELOPED ADVERSE EVENT RADIOCEPHALIC ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA LOW TRANSONIC FLOW, A STENOSIS IN VENOUS OUTFLOW WHICH REQUIRED ADDITIONAL SURGICAL INTERVENTION. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE SUBJECT HAD TARGET LESION RESTENOSIS IN CEPHALIC VEIN WITH MAXIMUM INITIAL STENOSIS OF EIGHTY PERCENT. STANDARD PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINOUS ANGIOPLASTY AND OTHER DRUG COATED BALLOON CATHETER WERE USED FOR TREATMENT. TREATMENT RE-INTERVENTION WAS SUCCESSFUL, NO NEW ACCESS WAS CREATED, AND THE PATIENT RECOVERED WITH FINAL RESIDUAL STENOSIS OF ZERO PERCENT. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Restenosis

    MAUDE report 17281180 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 16, 2020Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE IN LEFT ARM AV FISTULA, THE BALLOON ALLEGEDLY HAD A PINHOLE RUPTURE AT 11ATM. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10282329 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 2, 2019Off-Label Use; Material Rupture; Off-Label Use; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED AT 6 ATMOSPHERES (ATMS) WHILE TREATING THE IN-STENT TARGET LESION OF THE DISTAL LEFT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY. THE HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP) USED A CONTRALATERAL APPROACH TO GAIN PATIENT ACCESS. THE HCP DID NOT PREDILATE THE IN-STENT TARGET LESION. THE STENT WAS INTACT AND DID NOT APPEAR TO BE FRACTURED. THE HCP REPORTEDLY ADVANCED THE LUTONIX DCB TO THE TARGET LESION IN THE ZILVER PTX STENT, AND INFLATED THE BALLOON TO 6 ATMS. AFTER THE LUTONIX DCB ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED, REPORTEDLY IT WAS REMOVED IN ITS ENTIRETY WITHOUT DIFFICULTY. THE HCP COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE WITH ANOTHER LUTONIX DCB. IN THE OPINION OF THE HCP, THE INFLATION WITHIN THE ZILVER STENT WAS RELATED TO THE NATURE OF THE RUPTURE. THE LUTONIX DCB WAS RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT OUTCOMES WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8573861 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 12, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A CLINICAL REGISTRY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE LEFT PROXIMAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 28 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S LEFT SFA VASCULATURE WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED AND THE HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP) DEEMED IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE OR PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Reocclusion

    MAUDE report 8333655 ↗
  • InjuryNov 21, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH A POST MARKET CLINICAL STUDY THAT DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE, A LUTONIX PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE RIGHT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). APPROXIMATELY 6 MONTHS AFTER THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT¿S RIGHT SFA WAS REPORTEDLY REOCCLUDED. APPROXIMATELY TWO WEEKS LATER, A REVASCULARIZATION WAS PERFORMED AND THE HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP) DEEMED IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE INVESTIGATOR ASSESSED THAT THE EVENT WAS POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE STUDY DEVICE, BUT NOT RELATED TO THE PROCEDURE. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED BY THE USER FACILITY AND IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Reocclusion

    MAUDE report 8096318 ↗

Other Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter devices

All Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page