Skip to content

Bard® Suction Connector EN0066000Recalls & reported problems

C. R. Bard, Inc. · Bard® Suction Connector · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741128707), received between Apr 27, 2022 and Feb 14, 2024 — classified as 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Component Misassembled” (1 report).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Dec 20, 2023Class IIOpen, Classified

    BD (C.R. Bard) has received user complaints reporting that during use of BD Bard NG Sump Tubes with ENFit Connectors, inadequate or reduced suction, decompression, and drainage occurred.

    Z-0806-2024 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Component Misassembled1
  • Component Missing1
  • Defective Component1
  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Fitting Problem1
  • Fluid/Blood Leak1
  • Incorrect Measurement1
  • Partial Blockage1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 14, 2024Defective Component; Defective Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NASOGASTRIC TUBES HAD UNKNOWN ISSUE. (EN0056120) (EN0056140) (EN0056160) (EN0056180) (EN0066000)

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18701936 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 28, 2023Incorrect Measurement; Fitting Problem; Incorrect Measurement; Fitting Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT NASOGASTRIC SUMP TUBE AND IT HAS THE ENFIT DEVICE ON IT. WHAT THEY WERE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WAS HOW TO CONNECT IT SUCTION BECAUSE THE LUER LOCK DECREASED THE DIAMETER OF THE TUBE. EN0046160 AND EN0066000.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18220499 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 12, 2023Partial Blockage; Partial Blockage

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CUSTOMER WANTED TO KNOW IF THERE WAS ANY RISK WITH RESTRICTED SUCTION CAUSED BY DEBRIS CLOGGING THE SMALLER SUCTION ADAPTER ON THE NASOGASTRIC TUBES. IT WAS RECOMMENDED TO PERIODICALLY STOP SUCTION, IRRIGATE AND THEN CONTINUE SUCTIONING AND WAS TOLD THAT IT HAD BEEN A PERCEIVED RISK THAT THEY HAVE HEARD BUT NOT OF ANYONE ENCOUNTERING IT. CUSTOMER STATED THAT THEY HAVE FILED AT LEAST ONE MEDSUN REPORT THAT WEEK BECAUSE OF CLOGGING ISSUES THAT WERE OCCURRING FREQUENTLY AND WANTED TO KNOW ALL DOCUMENTED STEPS FOR RESOLVING CLOGS THAT BD HAD EXPLORED. PER FOLLOW VIA PHONE 29MARCH2023, CUSTOMER STATES THEY ARE STILL HAVING THE ISSUES AND THAT IT APPEARS THE ISSUES OCCURS MORE DURING POST OP AS PATIENTS MAY HAVE BLOOD CLOTS THAT GET STUCK DURING IRRIGATION. NO ADDITIONAL MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16919228 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 4, 2022Component Missing; Component Misassembled; Component Missing; Component Misassembled

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CUSTOMER WERE EXPERIENCED DIFFICULTIES IN REMOVING SUCTION TUBING FROM THE NASOGASTRIC TUBE ONCE IT HAS BEEN CONNECTED. CUSTOMER ALSO STATED THAT THEY HAD BILE AND SECRETIONS CAME OUT OF THE ANTIREFLUX VALVE END OF THE TUBE WHICH WAS GETTING ON PATIENTS AND BEDDING . CUSTOMER ASKED IS THERE SOME SORT OF POSITIONING THAT THEY NEED TO DO TO HELP WITH THIS PROBLEM. PER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA EMAIL ON 07APR2022, CUSTOMER STATED THAT THE ENFIT TUBES DID NOT HAVE THE PREVENT FILTER ATTACHED. STATED THAT IT WAS THE LITTLE DISC SHAPED INTEGRAL PLUG COMPONENT AT THE END OF THE PIGTAIL. INQUIRER RESPONDED THAT THE PLUG WAS JUST FOR WHEN THEY WERE TRANSPORTING THE PATIENT AND NOT SURE WHY THE ENFIT VERSION DID NOT INCLUDE IT. INQUIRER ASSUMED THAT THERE WAS AN ENGINEERING REASON BUT COULD NOT SAID FOR SURE, IT SHOULD NOT HAVE ANY IMPACT ON THE ISSUE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14282030 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 27, 2022Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CUSTOMER WERE EXPERIENCED DIFFICULTIES IN REMOVING SUCTION TUBING FROM THE NASOGASTRIC TUBE ONCE IT HAS BEEN CONNECTED . IT WAS ALSO STATED THAT THEY HAVE HAD BILE AND THE SECRETIONS CAME OUT OF THE ANTIREFLUX VALVE END OF THE TUBE WHICH WAS GETTING ON PATIENTS AND BEDDING . CUSTOMER ASKED IS THERE SOME SORT OF POSITIONING THAT THEY NEED TO DO TO HELP WITH THIS PROBLEM . AS PER THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA EMAIL ON 07APR2022, CUSTOMER STATED THAT THE ENFIT TUBES DID NOT HAVE THE PREVENT FILTER ATTACHED. STATED THAT IT WAS THE LITTLE DISC SHAPED INTEGRAL PLUG COMPONENT AT THE END OF THE PIGTAIL. INQUIRER RESPONDED THAT THE PLUG WAS JUST FOR WHEN THEY WERE TRANSPORTING THE PATIENT AND NOT SURE WHY THE ENFIT VERSION DID NOT INCLUDE IT. INQUIRER ASSUMED THAT THERE WAS AN ENGINEERING REASON BUT COULD NOT SAY FOR SURE. IT SHOULD NOT HAVE ANY IMPACT ON THE ISSUE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14220197 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 27, 2022Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CUSTOMER WERE EXPERIENCED DIFFICULTIES IN REMOVING SUCTION TUBING FROM THE NASOGASTRIC TUBE ONCE IT HAS BEEN CONNECTED. CUSTOMER ALSO STATED THAT THEY HAD BILE AND SECRETIONS CAME OUT OF THE ANTIREFLUX VALVE END OF THE TUBE WHICH WAS GETTING ON PATIENTS AND BEDDING. CUSTOMER ASKED IS THERE SOME SORT OF POSITIONING THAT THEY NEED TO DO TO HELP WITH THIS PROBLEM . PER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA EMAIL ON 07APR2022, CUSTOMER STATED THAT THE ENFIT TUBES DID NOT HAVE THE PREVENT FILTER ATTACHED. STATED THAT IT WAS THE LITTLE DISC SHAPED INTEGRAL PLUG COMPONENT AT THE END OF THE PIGTAIL. INQUIRER RESPONDED THAT THE PLUG WAS JUST FOR WHEN THEY WERE TRANSPORTING THE PATIENT AND NOT SURE WHY THE ENFIT VERSION DID NOT INCLUDE IT. INQUIRER ASSUMED THAT THERE WAS AN ENGINEERING REASON BUT COULD NOT SAY FOR SURE. IT SHOULD NOT HAVE ANY IMPACT ON THE ISSUE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14220078 ↗

Other CATHETER AND TIP, SUCTION devices

All CATHETER AND TIP, SUCTION devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page