LUTONIX ® 035 Drug Coated Balloon PTA Catheter LX3575680VRecalls & reported problems
Lutonix, Inc. · Lutonix® AV Drug Coated Balloon PTA Catheter 6x80x75 · Class 3
All models of LUTONIX 035 Drug Coated Balloon PTA Catheter (19)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741135408), received between Feb 2, 2021 and May 9, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Material Rupture2
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Restenosis2
- Stenosis1
- Thrombosis/Thrombus1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 9, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE RESULTS OF A CLINICAL TRIAL THAT ONE MONTH POST INDEX PROCEDURE USING A DRUG-COATED BALLOON CATHETER IN THE CEPHALIC VEIN, THE SUBJECT HAD AN ADVERSE EVENT OF RECURRENT STENOSIS IN THE DRAINAGE VEIN AND JUXTA-ANASTOMOSIS REGION AND REQUIRED AN ARTERIOVENOUS ACCESS CIRCUIT REINTERVENTION. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE TARGET LESION WAS IN THE UPPER ARM WITH FIFTY FOUR PERCENT INITIAL STENOSIS AND ZERO PERCENT FINAL RESIDUAL STENOSIS. REPORTEDLY, STANDARD PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY WAS USED FOR TREATMENT. THE RE-INTERVENTION WAS SUCCESSFUL, AND THE OUTCOME OF THE ADVERSE EVENT WAS RESOLVED. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Restenosis; Stenosis; Thrombosis/Thrombus
MAUDE report 19275999 ↗InjuryOct 9, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE RESULTS OF A CLINICAL TRIAL THAT TWO MONTHS AND EIGHT DAYS POST AN INDEX PROCEDURE COMPLETION USING A DRUG-COATED BALLOON CATHETER IN THE CEPHALIC VEIN, THE SUBJECT DEVELOPED A SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENT OF ANASTOMOTIC STENOSIS ON THE CEPHALIC VEIN DUE TO DECREASED ACCESS BLOOD FLOW WHICH REQUIRED AN ARTERIOVENOUS ACCESS CIRCUIT REINTERVENTION. REPORTEDLY, STANDARD PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY AND DRUG COATED BALLOON CATHETER PROCEDURES WERE PERFORMED TO TREAT DECREASED ACCESS BLOOD FLOW. THE TREATMENT RE-INTERVENTION WAS SUCCESSFUL, NO NEW ACCESS CREATED, AND THE OUTCOME OF THE SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENT WAS RESOLVED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT FIVE MONTHS AND TWENTY-TWO DAYS POST AN INDEX PROCEDURE COMPLETION, THE SUBJECT DEVELOPED A SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENT OF TWO STENOSIS ONE IN THE CEPHALIC VEIN AND THE OTHER ON THE SUBCLAVIAN VEIN DUE TO DECREASED ACCESS BLOOD FLOW WHICH REQUIRED AN ARTERIOVENOUS ACCESS CIRCUIT REINTERVENTION. REPORTEDLY, STANDARD PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY AND DRUG COATED BALLOON CATHETER PROCEDURES WERE PERFORMED TO TREAT DECREASED ACCESS BLOOD FLOW. THE TREATMENT RE-INTERVENTION WAS SUCCESSFUL, NO NEW AC
Patient problems: Restenosis
MAUDE report 17894225 ↗MalfunctionFeb 18, 2022Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE VIA CEPHALIC VEIN FOR TREATING STENOSIS AND HIGH VENOUS PRESSURE, THE BALLOON ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED AT NOMINAL PRESSURE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON WAS RETRIEVED WITHOUT ANY ISSUE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13556386 ↗MalfunctionFeb 2, 2021Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE THROUGH THE RIGHT UPPER ARM, THE DRUG COATED DEVICE ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED AT 12 ATM. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11264466 ↗
Other Drug-coated peripheral transluminal angioplasty catheter devices
- LUTONIX ® 035 Drug Coated Balloon PTA Catheter LX3575760VLutonix, Inc. · Drug-coated peripheral transluminal angioplasty catheter2 deaths60 reports
- LUTONIX ® 035 Drug Coated Balloon PTA Catheter LX3575860VLutonix, Inc. · Drug-coated peripheral transluminal angioplasty catheter3 deaths54 reports
- IN.PACT™ AV IAV06008008PMedtronic, Inc. · Drug-coated peripheral transluminal angioplasty catheter1 recall1 report
- LUTONIX ® 035 Drug Coated Balloon PTA Catheter LX35751060VLutonix, Inc. · Drug-coated peripheral transluminal angioplasty catheter25 reports
- IN.PACT™ AV IAV08004008PMedtronic, Inc. · Drug-coated peripheral transluminal angioplasty catheter21 reports
- IN.PACT™ AV IAV08006008PMedtronic, Inc. · Drug-coated peripheral transluminal angioplasty catheter19 reports
- LUTONIX ® 035 Drug Coated Balloon PTA Catheter LX3575660VLutonix, Inc. · Drug-coated peripheral transluminal angioplasty catheter1 death19 reports
- LUTONIX ® 035 Drug Coated Balloon PTA Catheter LX3575840VLutonix, Inc. · Drug-coated peripheral transluminal angioplasty catheter17 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page