DryDoc Vacuum Station Patient Tubing 70PHRecalls & reported problems
C. R. Bard, Inc. · Patient Tubing for use with DryDoc Vacuum Station · Class 1
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741151811), received between Jun 26, 2018 and Mar 14, 2020 — classified as 3 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Disconnection” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Disconnection2
- Patient-Device Incompatibility2
- Contamination /Decontamination Problem1
- Fluid/Blood Leak1
- Leak/Splash1
- Microbial Contamination of Device1
- Obstruction of Flow1
- Suction Problem1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- Unspecified Infection2
- Bacterial Infection1
- Bruise/Contusion1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- Skin Discoloration1
- Skin Irritation1
- Skin Tears1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 14, 2020Microbial Contamination of Device; Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A BACTERIAL GROWTH INSIDE OF THE PATIENT TUBING THAT HAS MADE THE PATIENT SICK. THE PATIENT'S DOCTOR ALLEGED THAT THE BACTERIAL GROWTH CAUSED A BACTERIA INFECTION. IT IS UNKNOWN WHAT MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS WERE GIVEN FOR THE INFECTION.
Patient problems: Bacterial Infection; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 9833027 ↗InjuryMar 3, 2020Patient-Device Incompatibility; Contamination /Decontamination Problem; Patient-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT GOT AN INFECTION FROM THE PATIENT HOSE DUE TO SEDIMENT BUILD UP BETWEEN THE OVER SLEEVE AND THE HOSE. PER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA PHONE FROM THE CUSTOMER CONTACT ON 25FEB2020, THE PATIENT HOSE WAS CHANGED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF USE AND THE PATIENT'S INFECTION WAS TREATMENT WITH ANTIBIOTICS VIA INJECTIONS.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 9780677 ↗MalfunctionDec 9, 2019Leak/Splash; Fluid/Blood Leak; Leak/Splash
IT WAS REPORTED THAT URINE LEAKED AROUND THE CATHETER. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9439902 ↗MalfunctionOct 10, 2019Obstruction of Flow
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT¿S SON STATED THAT HIS MOM WAS NOT ABLE TO USE THE DRYDOC AS THE FECAL MATTER KEPT PLUGGING UP THE HOSES. THE HOSES WERE CHANGED SEVERAL TIMES, BUT THE DEVICE STILL WOULD NOT WORK.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9176543 ↗InjuryAug 23, 2018Disconnection
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE HOSE DISCONNECTED FROM THE WICK AND ALLEGEDLY BRUISED THE PATIENT'S THIGH DUE TO THE MACHINE SUCTIONING THE PATIENT'S SKIN INTO THE HOSE. THE NURSE APPLIED A PRESCRIPTION CREAM TO THE BRUISE.
Patient problems: Bruise/Contusion; Skin Discoloration
MAUDE report 7811854 ↗MalfunctionJun 26, 2018Disconnection; Suction Problem; Disconnection
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PUREWICK PATIENT TUBING DISCONNECTED FROM THE PUREWICK DEVICE; THEREFORE, THE PUREWICK PATIENT TUBING ALLEGEDLY SUCTIONED TO THE PATIENT'S SKIN FOR AN ENTIRE NIGHT. THE PATIENT ALLEGEDLY EXPERIENCED A BLISTER AND THE HOME NURSE WAS CALLED TO SHAVE AND CLEAN THE PATIENT 'S BLISTER.
Patient problems: Skin Irritation; Skin Tears
MAUDE report 7639628 ↗
Other Collector, urine, powered, non indwelling catheter devices
- PureWick Female External Catheter PWFX30C. R. Bard, Inc. · Collector, urine, powered, non indwelling catheter7 deaths1,091 reports
- PureWick Urine Collection System PW200C. R. Bard, Inc. · Collector, urine, powered, non indwelling catheter501 reports
- PureWick Urine Collection System PW100C. R. Bard, Inc. · Collector, urine, powered, non indwelling catheter494 reports
- PureWick PWFXH30C. R. Bard, Inc. · Collector, urine, powered, non indwelling catheter230 reports
- PureWick Urine Collection System PWKIT03C. R. Bard, Inc. · Collector, urine, powered, non indwelling catheter101 reports
- PureWick PWMX30C. R. Bard, Inc. · Collector, urine, powered, non indwelling catheter1 death85 reports
- PureWick Female External Catheter PWF030C. R. Bard, Inc. · Collector, urine, powered, non indwelling catheter66 reports
- DryDoc Vacuum Station DD15C. R. Bard, Inc. · Collector, urine, powered, non indwelling catheter43 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page