Skip to content

LUTONIX® Drug Coated Balloon LX35757100VRecalls & reported problems

Lutonix, Inc. · Lutonix 035 7X100MMX75CM · Class 3

All models of LUTONIX Drug Coated Balloon (107)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00801741187704), received between Jan 29, 2024 and Jan 29, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Restenosis1
  • Thrombosis/Thrombus1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 29, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE RESULTS OF A CLINICAL TRIAL THAT FIVE MONTHS AND EIGHT DAYS POST AN INDEX PROCEDURE USING A DRUG-COATED BALLOON CATHETER, IN THE CEPHALIC VEIN AT THE CANNULATION ZONE, THE SUBJECT HAD AN ADVERSE EVENT OF CEPHALIC VEIN RESTENOSIS AND WAS TREATED WITH AN AV ACCESS CIRCUIT REINTERVENTION. REPORTEDLY, STANDARD PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY AND A DRUG COATED BALLOON CATHETER WERE USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION. THE RE-INTERVENTION WAS SUCCESSFUL, AND THE OUTCOME WAS RESOLVED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT ONE YEAR, TWO MONTHS AND TWENTY-FOUR DAYS POST AN INDEX PROCEDURE USING A DRUG COATED BALLOON CATHETER, THE SUBJECT HAD AN ADVERSE EVENT OF FISTULOGRAM, RECANALIZATION AND ANGIOPLASTY AND THROMBOSIS OF CEPHALIC ARCH, JUXTA-ANASTOMOTIC STENOSIS AND WAS TREATED WITH AN AV ACCESS CIRCUIT RE-INTERVENTION. REPORTEDLY, STANDARD PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY, STENT GRAFT PLACEMENT, LUTONIX DCB AND THROMBECTOMY/THROMBOLYSIS WERE USED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION WITH INITIAL STENOSIS OF 60% AND FINAL RESIDUAL STENOSIS OF 3% AND ACCESS THROMBOSIS OF 40% AND FINAL RESIDUAL STENOSIS OF 33%. FURTHERMORE, THE RE-INTERVENTION WAS SUCCESSFUL, AND THE CURRENT

    Patient problems: Restenosis; Thrombosis/Thrombus

    MAUDE report 18593689 ↗

Other Drug-coated peripheral transluminal angioplasty catheter devices

All Drug-coated peripheral transluminal angioplasty catheter devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page