FlareHawk FHTAS100299SRecalls & reported problems
Integrity Implants Inc. · Shim, 8mm or 11mm x 29 mm, 0 degree, FH9 Sterile · Class 2 · Implant
All models of FlareHawk (29)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00810045530499), received between Oct 25, 2023 and Oct 25, 2023 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Migration1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 25, 2023Migration; Migration
ON (B)(6) 2023 ACCELUS WAS INFORMED OF A REVISION SURGERY TO REMOVE AN UNLOCKED FLAREHAWK 9 SHIM FROM A TIHAWK 9 IMPLANTED CAGE. THE INITIAL SURGERY TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6) 2023. IT WAS LATER REPORTED THAT THE SHIM WAS UNLOCKED AND MIGRATING FROM THE SHELL. DURING THE REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2023, THE SURGEON MADE INCISION ON LEFT SIDE OF PATIENT AND DISSECTED DOWN TO THE L5-S1 POSTERIOR JOINT ON LEFT SIDE OF PATIENT. RETRACTION OF THE TISSUE WAS PERFORMED OVER LEFT SIDE L5-S1. THE SURGEON THEN REMOVED THE SHIM WITH THE USE OF PITUITARIES. THE SURGEON WAS ADVISED BY VINCENT FRAZIER (SALES REP) TO REMOVE THE SHELL PER THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE MANUAL; HOWEVER, THEY CHOSE TO LEAVE THE SHELL IN PLACE AT L5-S1. IN-DEPTH ASSESSMENT OF EXITING NERVE ROOTS AND SPINAL WERE DONE, THE PROCEDURE WAS THEN COMPLETED WITHOUT ISSUE. REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT WAS NOT EXPERIENCING ANY SYMPTOMS AS A RESULT OF THE MIGRATED SHIM. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT HARM WAS REPORTED DURING THE REVISION SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18007440 ↗
Other Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar devices
- T-PAL 03.812.003Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar152 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.004Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar120 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068073Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall66 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall51 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall46 reports
- EIT TLIF Inserter TFT30101EIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar88 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.001Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar76 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069096Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall25 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page