Skip to content

uNion MAX UU201-02-0028Recalls & reported problems

Ulrich Medical Usa, Inc. · High Angulation Plate, 2-Level, 28 mm · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00810076334547), received between Oct 7, 2024 and Jan 23, 2026 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
  • No Apparent Adverse Event1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 23, 2026Break

    DURING THE CASE THE SURGEON WAS REMOVING THE PLATE TO TAMP BACK (REPOSITION) ONE OF THE INTERBODIES. ONCE HE PUT THE PLATE BACK IN PLACE ONE OF THE CAMS DISASSOCIATED FROM THE PLATE WHILE IT WAS BEING TURNED. THE CAM CAME OFF WITH THE DRIVER. THE PLATE WAS REPLACED WITH A NEW ONE AND ALL PARTS WERE RETRIEVED. THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 24168064 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 7, 2024Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; No Apparent Adverse Event; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; No Apparent Adverse Event

    PATIENT WAS NOT EXPERIENCING ANY ISSUES, BUT CAME IN FOR STANDARD POST-OP FOLLOW UP. AFTER THE SCAN, THE SURGEON NOTICED THAT ONE OF THE SCREWS WAS BACKING OUT. WHEN ASKED, THE SURGEON THINKS THAT HE TURNED THE LOCKING CAM BUT WAS UNCERTAIN. THIS WAS A MALFUNCTION, NO SERIOUS INJURY. THE SCREW WAS LEFT IN PLACE NO INTERVENTION OR REVISION IS NEEDED AT THIS TIME. IF CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD CHANGE A FOLLOW UP WILL BE ISSUED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20392087 ↗

Other Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Intervertebral Body devices

All Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Intervertebral Body devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page