Skip to content

Amplatzer™ TorqVue™ 9-TVLP4F90/060Recalls & reported problems

St. Jude Medical, Inc. · LP Delivery System · Class 2

All models of Amplatzer TorqVue (7)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00811806011561), received between Nov 25, 2024 and Jun 11, 2026 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fluid/Blood Leak” (4 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 2 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Mar 17, 2025Class IIOpen, Classified

    Device may have a small breach in the proximal end of the shaft under the strain relief of the delivery system. Breach is not visibly detectable and may lead to prolonged procedure, blood loss, or air ingress with potential for air embolism.

    Z-1643-2025 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fluid/Blood Leak4
  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 11, 2026Fluid/Blood Leak; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2026, A 4F AMPLATZER TORQVUE LP WAS CHOSEN FOR A PROCEDURE. DURING PROCEDURE, A HOLE IN THE VALVE WAS NOTED AND A VALVE NOT LEAK-TIGHT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25466287 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 10, 2025Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A 3MM X 4MM AMPLATZER PICCOLO OCCLUDER WAS SELECTED FOR A PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 USING A 4F AMPLATZER TORQVUE LOW PROFILE CATHETER TO CLOSE A PATENT DUCTUS ARTERIOSUS (PDA) FOR A 2-WEEK-OLD PATIENT THAT WEIGHED 1KG. THE DEVICE WAS PREPARED PER IFU. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHILE ADVANCING THE OCCLUDER THROUGH THE DELIVERY CATHETER IT WAS NOTED THAT THERE WAS A LEAK AT THE PROXIMAL END OF THE DELIVERY CATHETER WHERE THE WHITE TUBING ATTACHES TO THE BLUE CATHETER. THE OCCLUDER WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED USING THE SAME DELIVERY CATHETER. THE PATIENT REMAINED HEMODYNAMICALLY STABLE THROUGHOUT THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAYS IN THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE EFFECTS TO THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT STATUS WAS STABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21346230 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 26, 2024Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2024, A 4F AMPLATZER TORQVUE LP DELIVERY SYSTEM (LOT 10353324 DEVICE 1) WAS CHOSEN FOR PROCEDURE DURING A PATENT DUCTUS ARTERIOSUS (PDA) CLOSURE ON A 4-WEEK OLD, 1.1KG PATIENT. THE DELIVERY SYSTEM WAS PREPARED. THE DELIVERY SYSTEM WAS INITIALLY USED, BUT IT WAS NOTED TO HAVE A LEAK AT THE PROXIMAL END OF THE CATHETER WHERE THE WHITE TUBING ATTACHES TO THE BLUE CATHETER. THE DELIVERY SYSTEM WAS REMOVED, AND ANOTHER 4F AMPLATZER TORQVUE LP DELIVERY SYSTEM (LOT 10353324 DEVICE 2) WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING DEVICE PREPARATION IT WAS ALSO NOTED TO HAVE A LEAK AT THE SAME SPOT. THE SECOND DELIVERY SYSTEM (LOT 10353324 DEVICE 2) DID NOT MAKE CONTACT WITH THE PATIENT. A THIRD 4F AMPLATZER TORQVUE LP DELIVERY SYSTEM (LOT 10334851) WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY DEPLOY THE DEVICE. THE PATIENT REMAINED HEMODYNAMICALLY STABLE THROUGHOUT THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS A DELAY IN PROCEDURE, BUT THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20783175 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 25, 2024Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2024, A 4F AMPLATZER TORQVUE LP DELIVERY SYSTEM (LOT 10353324) WAS CHOSEN FOR PROCEDURE DURING A PATENT DUCTUS ARTERIOSUS (PDA) CLOSURE ON A 4-WEEK OLD, 1.1KG PATIENT. THE DELIVERY SYSTEM WAS PREPARED BY THE SCRUB TECH. THE DELIVERY SYSTEM WAS INITIALLY USED, BUT IT WAS NOTED TO HAVE A LEAK AT THE PROXIMAL END OF THE CATHETER WHERE THE WHITE TUBING ATTACHES TO THE BLUE CATHETER. THE DELIVERY SYSTEM WAS REMOVED, AND ANOTHER 4F AMPLATZER TORQVUE LP DELIVERY SYSTEM (LOT 10353324) WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING DEVICE PREPARATION IT WAS ALSO NOTED TO HAVE A LEAK AT THE SAME SPOT. THE SECOND DELIVERY SYSTEM DID NOT MAKE CONTACT WITH THE PATIENT. A THIRD 4F AMPLATZER TORQVUE LP DELIVERY SYSTEM (LOT 10334851) WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY DEPLOY THE DEVICE. THE PATIENT REMAINED HEMODYNAMICALLY STABLE THROUGHOUT THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS A DELAY IN PROCEDURE, BUT THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS REPORTED. THE PATIENT STATUS WAS REPORTED AS STABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20773668 ↗

Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices

All CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page