ZOOM™ Reperfusion Catheter ICRC035158 (UDI 00812212030207)Recalls & reported problems
Imperative Care, Inc. · ZOOM 035 160 cm RC · Class 2
All models of ZOOM Reperfusion Catheter (6)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00812212030207), received between Mar 15, 2021 and Jul 8, 2021 — classified as 2 injuries.
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K202182); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
Patient problems
- Extravasation1
- Perforation of Vessels1
- Vascular Dissection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 8, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
PATIENT PRESENTED WITH AN M3 MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY (MCA) OCCLUSION. ACCESS WAS OBTAINED WITH A COMPETITOR ACCESS CATHETER WITH PURCHASE IN THE HIGH CERVICAL SEGMENT OF THE INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (ICA). A COMPETITOR GUIDE WIRE WAS ADVANCED UNTIL IT CROSSED THE CLOT IN M3 MCA, AND THE ZOOM 35 WAS ADVANCED TO THE FACE OF THE CLOT. THE M3 MCA VESSEL SIZE WAS NOTED TO BE APPROXIMATELY 1.5MM. ONE PASS WAS PERFORMED, AND UPON REMOVAL OF THE ZOOM 35 CLOT APPEARED TO BE ON THE DISTAL TIP. ANGIOGRAM PERFORMED AFTER THE FIRST PASS INDICATED A VESSEL PERFORATION IN THE M3 MCA. THE OPERATOR BELIEVES THE PERFORATION WAS DUE TO PATIENT MOVEMENT DURING THE ASPIRATION PROCEDURE. THE CASE WAS CONCLUDED AND THE PATIENT WAS INTUBATED TO MANAGE THE BLEEDING. THE STROKE SELF-RESOLVED AND PATIENT IS CURRENTLY DOING WELL.
Patient problems: Perforation of Vessels
MAUDE report 12136379 ↗InjuryMar 15, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A THROMBECTOMY PROCEDURE TO TREAT A STROKE IN THE LEFT M1. ACCESS WAS OBTAINED THROUGH THE RIGHT RADIAL ARTERY INTO THE LEFT CERVICAL CAROTID USING A 8F BALLAST LONG SHEATH. A COMBINATION OF ARISTOTLE GUIDEWIRE, ZOOM 35 AND ZOOM 71 WAS ADVANCED TO THE CLOT. THE FIRST ATTEMPT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL, THE ARISTOTLE 24 WIRE WAS ADVANCED FURTHER TO CATHETERIZE THE M1. WHILE ADVANCING THE ARISTOTLE 24 WIRE, IT APPEARED THAT THE WIRE WAS TRAVELING OUTSIDE THE PREVIOUS PATH OF THE VESSEL. A CONTRAST INJECTION CONFIRMED THAT THE VESSEL HAD A SMALL DISSECTION. THE DISSECTION WAS OBSERVED AT LEFT MID M1. AT THIS TIME, THE 8F BALLAST WAS PARKED AT THE DISTAL LEFT CERVICAL CAROTID, ZOOM 71 AND ZOOM 35 CATHETERS WERE PARKED AT PROXIMAL M1. THE PHYSICIAN THEN TREATED THE EXTRAVASATION WITH A STENT. POST EXTRAVASATION TREATMENT, THE PHYSICIAN USED THE SAME ZOOM 71 AND ZOOM 35 COMBINATION FOR AN ADDITIONAL 2 PASSES AND WAS ABLE TO ACHIEVE REPERFUSION WITH A TICI SCORE OF 2B. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE POST PROCEDURE. PHYSICIAN STATED THAT IT WAS INCONCLUSIVE WHAT DEVICE CONTRIBUTED TO THE DISSECTION, BUT LIKELY THE GUIDEWIRE WAS MOST INVOLVED. BOTH ZOOM 71 AND ZOOM 3
Patient problems: Extravasation; Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 11486190 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K202182. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2577-2021 · Aug 13, 2021 · CompletedImperative Care, ZOOM 71 Reperfusion Catheter, REF: ICRC071137, TRX Tip, 137 cm, 6F (.083 in/2.11 mm), .071 in/1.8 mm), STERILE.EO, Rx Only, UDI: (01) 00812212030191. For neurova
Other Catheter, Thrombus Retriever devices
- Penumbra System 5MAXJET7KIT-BPenumbra, Inc. · Catheter, Thrombus Retriever1 recall14 deaths221 reports
- Penumbra System 3MAXCPenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER1 death241 reports
- EMBOTRAP ET309537Neuravi Limited · Catheter, Thrombus Retriever13 deaths177 reports
- ACE 5MAXACE068KITPenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER170 reports
- Embotrap ET009533Neuravi Limited · Catheter, Thrombus Retriever16 deaths153 reports
- Penumbra System 5MAXACE132Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER3 deaths112 reports
- Penumbra System 5MAXJET7KIT-APenumbra, Inc. · Catheter, Thrombus Retriever1 death94 reports
- Trevo XP 90185Stryker Corporation · CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER1 recall1 death40 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page