Skip to content

G-Probe™ Illuminate Box of 6 16200Recalls & reported problems

Iridex Corporation · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00813125015718), received between Apr 22, 2026 and Apr 22, 2026 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Use of Device Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • Eye Injury1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 22, 2026Use of Device Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED TO IRIDEX THAT WHILE USING THE G-PROBE ILLUMINATE LASER DELIVERY DEVICE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED THREE (03) SCLERAL BURNS. NO PERMANENT IMPAIRMENT WAS REPORTED TO IRIDEX, AND NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION ASSOCIATED WITH THE BURN WAS REPORTED TO IRIDEX. THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTOR PROVIDED A REPLACEMENT PROBE TO THE HOSPITAL. THE DEFECTIVE PROBE HAS BEEN RETAINED AND IS PENDING RETURN TO IRIDEX. ALTHOUGH, IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT PROBES ARE NOT SERVICED BY IRIDEX SINCE THEY ARE SINGLE USE AND IF THE PROBES ARE USED DURING TREATMENT, IT IS RECOMMENDED TO DISPOSE THEM AS THEY BECOME BIOHAZARD. NO ISSUES REGARDING THE LASER CONSOLE BEING USED DURING THE TREATMENT WERE REPORTED TO IRIDEX. THE REPORTED SETTINGS USED FOR TREATMENT WERE CONSISTENT WITH THE IFU (FOUR 20-SECOND PASSES PER HEMISPHERE; POWER: 1500 MV). NO PERMANENT IMPAIRMENT WAS REPORTED TO IRIDEX, AND NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION ASSOCIATED WITH THE BURN WAS REPORTED TO IRIDEX. ALSO, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROBE TIP WAS BURNED WHEN CHECKED UNDER THE MICROSCOPE. AS PER THE IFU, FOLLOWING ARE THE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TREATMENT PURPOSE - "KEEP THE G-PROBE ILLUMINATE TIP CLEAN TO MINIMIZE THE RISK OF BURNS TO THE OCULAR SURFACE.

    Patient problems: Eye Injury

    MAUDE report 24960750 ↗

Other Powered Laser Surgical Instrument devices

All Powered Laser Surgical Instrument devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page