Turbo-Elite Laser Atherectomy Catheter 414-159Recalls & reported problems
Spectranetics Corporation · Class 2
All models of Turbo-Elite Laser Atherectomy Catheter (12)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00813132024727), received between Aug 17, 2021 and Oct 11, 2023 — classified as 7 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Wrong Label” (3 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Nov 15, 2023Class IIOpen, Classified
Incorrect product labeling. Exterior product box label does not match internal pouch label.
Z-0509-2024 · Root cause: Packaging process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Wrong Label3
- Break2
- Material Split, Cut or Torn2
- Degraded1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- Unintended Radiation Exposure4
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 11, 2023Wrong Label; Wrong Label
DURING PREPARATION FOR USE, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT UPON OPENING A BOX LABELED WITH A SPECTRANETICS 1.4 TURBO-ELITE LASER ATHERECTOMY CATHETER, THE BOX CONTAINED A 2.0 TURBO-ELITE. THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED IN THE PATIENT, AND THERE WAS NO REPORTED INJURY. THIS REPORT CAPTURES THE LABELING DISCREPANCY THAT A LARGER SIZE DEVICE WAS CONTAINED INSIDE THE BOX, POTENTIAL FOR HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17913496 ↗MalfunctionOct 11, 2023Wrong Label; Wrong Label
DURING PREPARATION FOR USE, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT UPON OPENING A BOX LABELED WITH A SPECTRANETICS 1.4 TURBO-ELITE LASER ATHERECTOMY CATHETER, THE BOX CONTAINED A 2.0 TURBO-ELITE. THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED IN THE PATIENT, AND THERE WAS NO REPORTED INJURY. THIS REPORT CAPTURES THE LABELING DISCREPANCY THAT A LARGER SIZE DEVICE WAS CONTAINED INSIDE THE BOX, POTENTIAL FOR HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17913492 ↗MalfunctionOct 11, 2023Wrong Label; Wrong Label
DURING PREPARATION FOR USE, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT UPON OPENING A BOX LABELED WITH A SPECTRANETICS 1.4 TURBO-ELITE LASER ATHERECTOMY CATHETER, THE BOX CONTAINED A 2.0 TURBO-ELITE. THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED IN THE PATIENT, AND THERE WAS NO REPORTED INJURY. THIS REPORT CAPTURES THE LABELING DISCREPANCY THAT A LARGER SIZE DEVICE WAS CONTAINED INSIDE THE BOX, POTENTIAL FOR HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17913490 ↗MalfunctionJul 26, 2022Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
A PERIPHERAL ATHERECTOMY PROCEDURE COMMENCED TO TREAT A SLIGHTLY CALCIFIED LESION IN THE PATIENT'S MID POPLITEAL ARTERY. A SPECTRANETICS TURBO ELITE LASER ATHERECTOMY CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE PATIENT. AFTER THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE TURBO ELITE WAS SLICED OR COMING APART. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM. THIS EVENT IS BEING REPORTED FOR UNINTENDED RADIATION EXPOSURE, POTENTIAL FOR HARM.
Patient problems: Unintended Radiation Exposure
MAUDE report 15108431 ↗MalfunctionJun 14, 2022Break; Break
A PERIPHERAL ATHERECTOMY PROCEDURE COMMENCED TO TREAT A SLIGHTLY CALCIFIED, PLAQUE LESION IN THE PATIENT'S DISTAL POSTERIOR TIBIAL ARTERY. THE PHYSICIAN CHOSE TO USE A SPECTRANETICS TURBO ELITE LASER ATHERECTOMY CATHETER TO TREAT THE PATIENT. AFTER THE TREATMENT HAD BEEN COMPLETED, THE TURBO ELITE WAS REMOVED FROM THE OUTER SHEATH AND THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED THE FIBERS OF THE TURBO ELITE WERE EXPOSED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM. THIS EVENT IS BEING REPORTED FOR UNINTENDED RADIATION EXPOSURE, POTENTIAL FOR HARM.
Patient problems: Unintended Radiation Exposure
MAUDE report 14688935 ↗MalfunctionMay 11, 2022Degraded; Degraded
A PERIPHERAL ATHERECTOMY PROCEDURE COMMENCED TO TREAT A MODERATELY CALCIFIED LESION IN THE PATIENT'S DISTAL ANTERIOR TIBIAL (AT) VESSEL. THE PHYSICIAN CHOSE A SPECTRANETICS TURBO ELITE LASER ATHERECTOMY CATHETER TO TREAT THE PATIENT. DURING USE IN THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED THE TIP OF THE CATHETER AND THE SHEATH APPEARED BURNED. A NEW TURBO ELITE OF THE SAME MODEL WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WITH NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM. THIS EVENT IS BEING REPORTED FOR UNINTENDED RADIATION EXPOSURE, POTENTIAL FOR HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; Unintended Radiation Exposure
MAUDE report 14366167 ↗MalfunctionAug 17, 2021Break; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Break; Material Split, Cut or Torn
A PERIPHERAL ATHERECTOMY PROCEDURE COMMENCED TO TREAT A SLIGHTLY CALCIFIED LESION IN THE PATIENT'S MID SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). THE PHYSICIAN CHOSE TO USE A SPECTRANETICS TURBO ELITE LASER ATHERECTOMY CATHETER TO TREAT THE PATIENT. AFTER THE PHYSICIAN USED THE TURBO ELITE DEVICE IN THE PATIENT AND WAS REMOVING THE DEVICE, HE NOTICED THE "OUTER SHEATH WAS TORN" AND FIBERS WERE VISIBLE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS DIFFICULTY GETTING THE TURBO ELITE DEVICE THROUGH THE SHEATH AND BELIEVED THAT MAY HAVE BEEN THE REASON THE DEVICE WAS DAMAGED. A NEW SPECTRANETICS TURBO ELITE LASER ATHERECTOMY CATHETER WAS USED TO FINISH THE PROCEDURE, AND THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM. THIS EVENT IS BEING SUBMITTED TO CAPTURE THE TURBO ELITE WHICH WAS FOUND DAMAGED DURING USE AND RESULTED IN UNINTENDED RADIATION EXPOSURE WITH POTENTIAL FOR HARM.
Patient problems: Unintended Radiation Exposure
MAUDE report 12333209 ↗
Other Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy devices
- HawkOne™ H1-MCovidien LP · Catheter, peripheral, atherectomy1 recall367 reports
- JETSTREAM™ XC 112266-001Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, peripheral, atherectomy288 reports
- JETSTREAM™ XC 112264-001Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, peripheral, atherectomy262 reports
- SET Rotarex®S 6F 135cm (Straub Medical®) Version 1.0Straub Medical AG · Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy2 deaths206 reports
- SET Rotarex™S 6 F x 135 cm 80237Straub Medical AG · Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy1 recall79 reports
- HawkOne™ H1-SCovidien LP · Catheter, peripheral, atherectomy1 recall70 reports
- Turbo-Elite Laser Atherectomy Catheter 420-006Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy2 recalls19 reports
- Turbo-Elite Laser Atherectomy Catheter 417-152Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy2 recalls16 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page