Quick-Cross Support Catheter 518-036 (UDI 00813132029364)Recalls & reported problems
Philips Image Guided Therapy Corporation · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00813132029364), received between Dec 5, 2023 and Mar 30, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component3
- Material Separation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
- Foreign Body In Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 30, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component
A PERIPHERAL ATHERECTOMY PROCEDURE COMMENCED TO TREAT A LEFT ILIAC ARTERY. A SPECTRANETICS QUICK-CROSS SUPPORT CATHETER WAS USED TO ATTEMPT TO CROSS THE LESION; HOWEVER, THE MARKER BAND BECAME DISLODGED IN THE PATIENT. A STENT WAS PLACED TO JAIL/TACK THE MARKER BAND TO THE VESSEL WALL. A SECOND QUICK-CROSS WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THIS REPORT CAPTURES THE QUICK-CROSS MARKER BAND THAT DETACHED AND REMAINED IN THE PATIENT, POTENTIAL FOR HARM.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque
MAUDE report 24737371 ↗InjuryDec 26, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
A PERIPHERAL ATHERECTOMY PROCEDURE COMMENCED TO TREAT A NON-THROMBOTIC LESION IN THE MID SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING CLAUDICATION, AND HAD AN EXISTING STENT PRESENT IN THE AREA. A PHILIPS QUICK-CROSS SUPPORT CATHETER WAS USED TO TREAT THE PATIENT. WHILE USING A CONTRALATERAL APPROACH AND CROSSING BEHIND THE EXISTING STENT, THE QUICK-CROSS GOT STUCK, AND BROKE OFF IN TWO PIECES. ONE PORTION OF THE QUICK-CROSS WAS SUCCESSFULLY SNARED; HOWEVER, THE SECOND PORTION COULD NOT BE RETRIEVED AND WAS STENTED WITHIN THE PATIENT. A SECOND QUICK-CROSS WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THIS REPORT CAPTURES THE QUICK-CROSS WHICH SEPARATED AT THE SHAFT, REQUIRING INTERVENTION, WITH A PORTION RETAINED IN THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 21021582 ↗MalfunctionJun 18, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
A PERIPHERAL ATHERECTOMY PROCEDURE COMMENCED TO PERFORM AN ARTERIOGRAM, LEFT LOWER EXTREMITY (LLE) ANGIOGRAM, AND STENT PLACEMENT TO TREAT PERIPHERAL ARTERY DISEASE (PAD) IN THE LEFT ILIAC ARTERY (PATIENT HAS GANGRENE IN HER LLE). A SPECTRANETICS QUICK-CROSS SUPPORT CATHETER WAS USED TO ATTEMPT TO CROSS THE LESION; HOWEVER, THE QUICK-CROSS MARKER BANDS BECAME DISLOGED AND MOVED OUT OF PLACE, BUT REMAINED ON THE CATHETER. THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO MANIPULATE THE MARKER BANDS AND REMOVE THE DEVICE. A SECOND QUICK-CROSS WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WITH NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM. THIS EVENT IS BEING REPORTED OUT OF AN ABUNDANCE OF CAUTION WHICH CAPTURES THE QUICK-CROSS MARKER BANDS THAT DETACHED BUT REMAINED ON DEVICE, POTENTIAL FOR HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19562748 ↗MalfunctionMay 23, 2024
ELDERLY FEMALE WITH HISTORY OF PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE. CURRENTLY, SHE HAS GANGRENE OF LEFT LOWER EXTREMITY. PROCEDURE: INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY ARTERIOGRAM, LEFT LOWER EXTREMITY ANGIOGRAM WITH STENT PLACEMENT TO LEFT COMMON ILIAC. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE METAL MARKERS FOR CATHETER BECAME DISLODGED AND MOVED. SURGEON WAS ABLE TO MANIPULATE MARKERS WITHOUT HARM TO THE PATIENT. MANUFACTURER RESPONSE FOR CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS, QUICK-CROSS (PER SITE REPORTER), WILL FOLLOW UP.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 19380552 ↗MalfunctionDec 5, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ADDITIONAL CASE DETAIL OBTAINED (B)(6) 2023: THE QUICK-CROSS ADVANCED UP AND OVER A CALCIFIED BIFURCATION, WITH ONLY A SHORT SHEATH ON THE IPSILATERAL SIDE. THE PHYSICIAN WAS MANIPULATING A WIRE DOWN THE CONTRALATERAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) AND WAS REMOVING THE QUICK-CROSS CATHETER WHEN IT GOT STUCK COMING BACK OVER THE BIFURCATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18271252 ↗
Other Catheter, Percutaneous devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page