Skip to content

IC-8 Apthera IOL +22.5 DRecalls & reported problems

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated · One-piece UV blocking, hydrophobic acrylic small aperture intraocular lens. · Class 3 · Implant

All models of IC-8 Apthera IOL (20)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00813359020984), received between Mar 8, 2024 and Dec 22, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Discolored” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
  • Material Discolored1
  • Product Quality Problem1

Patient problems

  • Visual Disturbances3
  • Blurred Vision2
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Halo1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 22, 2025Material Discolored; Product Quality Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Material Discolored; Product Quality Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    T WAS REPORTED THAT AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) WAS EXPLANTED FROM A PATIENTS EYE DUE TO BLURRED VISION WITH A PURPLE HUE. CENTRAL POSTERIOR STREAKS WERE ALSO VISIBLE ON THE LENS. A SECOND IOL OF A DIFFERENT LENS MODEL AND POWER WERE IMPLANTED SUCCESSFULLY. THE SURGEON INDICATED THE CAUSE OF THE EVENT WAS POSSIBLY THE DELIVERY DEVICE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT NOT RECEIVED.

    Patient problems: Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 23863259 ↗
  • InjuryMar 12, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED INDICATING A DIFFERENT MODEL INTRAOCULAR LENS(IOL) WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT¿S FELLOW EYE ON THE SAME DATE. SINCE THE EXCHANGE PATIENT OUTCOME IS REPORTEDLY GOOD.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 21583536 ↗
  • InjuryNov 21, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY ONE MONTH AFTER IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) INTO THE LEFT EYE (OS), THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF HALOS AND GHOSTING IMAGES. APPROXIMATELY ONE AND A HALF MONTHS AFTER ONSET OF SYMPTOMS, YAG WAS PERFORMED FOR BLURRED VISION, GLARE AND DYSPHOTOPSIA, BUT SYMPTOMS DID NOT IMPROVE. APPROXIMATELY FIVE MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION, THE IOL WAS EXCHANGED WITH A DIFFERENT MODEL IOL, WITH A DIFFERENCE OF 3.5 DIOPTERS. AS OF THE 1-DAY POST-EXCHANGE EXAM, PATIENT IS REPORTEDLY DOING WELL.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Halo; Visual Disturbances

    MAUDE report 20746360 ↗
  • InjuryMar 8, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER THE IMPLANTATION OF AN INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL), THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF POOR VISUAL ACUITY AND HEADACHES. APPROXIMATELY 3 MONTHS POST-IMPLANTATION OF THE INITIAL IOL, THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A DIFFERENT MODEL IOL. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, BUT NOT RECEIVED.

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18870935 ↗

Other Extended Depth Of Focus Intraocular Lens devices

All Extended Depth Of Focus Intraocular Lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page