Luna 3D LUN3013-08Recalls & reported problems
Benvenue Medical, Inc. · 13mm, 8-Degree, Luna 3D Lordotic Implant Kit · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00813478020346), received between Dec 21, 2017 and Dec 21, 2017 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Unintended Movement” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Unintended Movement1
Patient problems
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryDec 21, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Unintended Movement; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Unintended Movement
ON (B)(6) 2017, THE COMPANY BECAME AWARE OF A REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED THAT DAY DUE TO PATIENT EXPERIENCING INCREASED SYMPTOMATIC PAIN. IT WAS FURTHER LEARNED THAT THE ORIGINAL CASE WAS COMPLETED ON (B)(6) 2017. BASED ON PROVIDED IMAGES, IT APPEARS THAT THE LUNA DEVICE HAD SLIGHTLY MIGRATED POSTERIORLY AT THE FIRST FOLLOW-UP AT 1-MONTH POST-OP. AT AROUND THE 6-MONTHS POST-OPERATION FOLLOW-UP, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A FALL WITH INCREASED SYMPTOMATIC RADICULOPATHY PAIN. AT THAT TIME, IMAGING SHOWED THAT THE MIDDLE MEMBER OF THE LUNA DEVICE HAD PARTIALLY DISASSEMBLED AND FURTHER MIGRATED POSTERIORLY INTO THE SPINAL CANAL. DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, THE IMPLANT WAS NOT SAFELY RETRIEVABLE AND AS A CONSEQUENCE, IT WAS LEFT IN PLACE AND FURTHER BONY DECOMPRESSION AROUND THE CANAL WAS PERFORMED. PROCEDURE CONTINUED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO OTHER ISSUES. NO FLUORO WAS TAKEN ON DAY OF REVISION.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 7141406 ↗
Other Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar devices
- T-PAL 03.812.003Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar152 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.004Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar120 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068073Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall66 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall51 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall46 reports
- EIT TLIF Inserter TFT30101EIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar88 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.001Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar76 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069096Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall25 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page