DuraMatrix Onlay CDSLM45Recalls & reported problems
Collagen Matrix, Inc. · Collagen Dura Substitute Membrane 4in x 5in (10.0cm x 12.5cm) · Class 2 · Implant
All models of DuraMatrix Onlay (3)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00813954020273), received between Oct 5, 2017 and Jul 22, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Dec 13, 2021Terminated
Outer packaging (outer pouch) is not sealed compromising sterility and result in potential risk of patient infection, which could lead to revision surgery
Z-0668-2022 · Root cause: Nonconforming Material/Component · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
Patient problems
- Abscess1
- Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage1
- Insufficient Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 22, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
COMPLAINT SUBMITTED THROUGH CLINICAL DATA COLLECTION, WITH LIMITED DETAILS PROVIDED. FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT OR EVENT IS UNLIKELY TO BECOME AVAILABLE. THE PRODUCT INVOLVED IS DURAMATRIX-ONLAY®. A PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN ADVERSE EVENT (AE) CHARACTERIZED AS WOUND DEHISCENCE WITH PURULENT DISCHARGE. THE INITIAL SURGERY WAS (B)(6) 2025 AND THE LOCATION OF THE IMPLANT WAS THE ANTERIOR FOSSA. NO SUTURES, SEALANTS OR OTHER DURAL CLOSURE PRODUCTS WERE USED DURING THE PROCEDURE. NO CSF LEAK WAS OBSERVED POST-PLACEMENT. A DRAINAGE SHUNT WAS USED. A ROUTINE FOLLOW UP VISIT ON (B)(6) 2025 NOTED NO ADVERSE EVENTS. HOWEVER, A SUBSEQUENT FOLLOW-UP VISIT ON (B)(6) 2025 INDICATED WOUND DEHISCENCE ON THE "SCALP, WOUND". THE PATIENT WAS INITIALLY PRESCRIBED CEPHALEXIN WHICH WAS SWITCHED TO DOXYCYCLINE DUE TO SENSITIVITIES. CLINICAL DATA COLLECTION INDICATED THAT THE ADVERSE EVENT WAS UNRELATED TO THE INTERVENTION. NO SURGICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION SURROUNDING PATIENT STATUS OR PATIENT OUTCOME WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 22568587 ↗InjuryJul 21, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
COMPLAINT SUBMITTED THROUGH CLINICAL DATA COLLECTION. LIMITED INFORMATION PROVIDED AND IT IS UNLIKELY FURTHER INFORMATION SURROUNDING THE PATIENT OR THE EVENT WILL BE PROVIDED. DURAMATRX-ONLAY COLLAGEN DURA MEMBRANE USED ON A PATIENT ON (B)((6) 2025 IN THE ANTERIOR FOSSA. PATIENT WAS PART OF CLINICAL STUDY FOR MENINGIOMA WHO GRADE 1. AT TIME OF INITIAL SURGERY, 3-0 AND 4-0 SYNTHETIC, NON-ABSORBABLE SUTURES WERE USED (NOT COLLAGEN MATRIX, INC. PRODUCTS). NO OTHER DURAL PRODUCTS WERE UTILIZED. A DRAINAGE SHUNT WAS ALSO USED (NOT A COLLAGEN MATRIX, INC. PRODUCT). THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS NOTED DURING THE INITIAL SURGERY. THERE WAS NO CSF LEAKAGE AFTER INITIAL PLACEMENT. THE CLINICIAN CLASSIFIED THE HANDLING PROPERTIES OF THE DURAMATRIX-ONLAY PRODUCT AS "GOOD" AND ALSO CLASSIFIED THE ADAPTABILITY OF THE PRODUCT TO ANATOMIC STRUCTURE AS "GOOD." AN ADVERSE EVENT WAS REPORTED ON 5/31/2025, IN WHICH AN INTRACRANIAL ABSCESS POST CRANIECTOMY IN THE BONE FLAP WAS NOTED. CLINICIAN CLASSIFIED THIS AS A SERIOUS, BUT UNEXPECTED, ADVERSE EVENT. HOSPITALIZATION WAS REQUIRED. INTERVENTION REQUIRED AS ADDITIONAL SURGERY WAS PERFORMED TO RE-DO THE CRANIECTOMY AND EVACUATION OF ABSCESS AND WASHOUT.
Patient problems: Abscess
MAUDE report 22560140 ↗InjuryOct 5, 2017Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
IT WAS INITIALLY REPORTED THAT THE DURAMATRIX ONLAY (CDSLM45) PRODUCT IN COMBINATION WITH DURAMATRIX SUTURABLE (DMS45; EMDR REPORT 2249852-2017-00017) WAS USED AS PART OF A POST AREA FOSSA CRANIOTOMY PROCEDURE WHICH RESULTED IN FOLLOW-UP SURGERY TO FIX A CEREBROSPINAL FLUID LEAK. BASED ON ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 10/11/2018, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE DURAMATRIX ONLAY (CDSML45) PRODUCT WAS NOT USED OR ASSOCIATED WITH THE INITIALLY REPORTED INCIDENT.
Patient problems: Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage
MAUDE report 6915042 ↗
Other Dura Substitute devices
- Durepair® 62100Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. · DURA SUBSTITUTE1 recall6 reports
- Durepair® 62105Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. · DURA SUBSTITUTE1 recall5 reports
- Durepair® 62110Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. · DURA SUBSTITUTE1 recall3 reports
- Durepair® 62111Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. · DURA SUBSTITUTE1 recall1 report
- Durepair® 62106Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. · DURA SUBSTITUTE1 recall1 report
- Durepair® 62158Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. · DURA SUBSTITUTE1 recall0 reports
- Biodesign G31091Cook Biotech Incorporated · DURA SUBSTITUTE1 recall0 reports
- Biodesign G31091Cook Biotech Incorporated · DURA SUBSTITUTE1 recall0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page