RejuvaKnee REJ075Recalls & reported problems
Collagen Matrix, Inc. · Collagen Meniscus Implant · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00813954026022), received between Jan 14, 2026 and Jan 14, 2026 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Disintegration” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Disintegration1
Patient problems
- Fibrosis1
- Inflammation1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 14, 2026Material Disintegration
A COMPLAINT WAS RECEIVED ON A COLLAGEN MENISCUS MEMBRANE. AT 4 MONTH MRI FINDING, THE COMPLAINT INDICATED "GRAFT MATERIAL IS NOT WELL APPRECIATED AT THE MENISCUS AND IS THOUGHT TO BE PRESENTLY DISPLACED TO THE ANTERIOR COMPARTMENT. NOT DEFINITIVE. MEDIAL MENISCUS IS PERIPHERALLY SUBLUXED WITH SOME REACTIVE MEDICAL MENISCAL CAPSULAR INFLAMMATION." SURGERY DATE WAS (B)(6) 2025. 47-YEAR-OLD MALE WITH PRIOR RIGHT MEDIAL MENISCECTOMY IN (B)(6) 2025, WHO HAD CONTINUED SYMPTOMS AFTER. SUBSEQUENT MRI SHOWED RESIDUAL TEAR AND MEDIAL MENISCUS DEFICIENCY. HE UNDERWENT IMPLANTATION OF (B)(6) ON (B)(6) 2025. HE WAS DOING WELL AND PROGRESSING WELL WITH WEIGHTBEARING AND THERAPY. THERE WERE NO SIGNS OF INFECTION PRESENT. MILD TO MODERATE EFFUSION WAS PRESENT, WHICH IS TO BE EXPECTED POST IMPLANT. THEN ON (B)(6) 2025, HE REPORTS WALKING THROUGH THIS HOME AND FEELING TWO LOUD POPS IN THE KNEE AND EXPERIENCING SOME DISCOMFORT THAT RESOLVED IN THAT MOMENT. HOWEVER, TWO DAYS LATER HE STATES HE WAS UNABLE TO FULLY EXTEND THE KNEE. HE WENT TO THERAPY AND WAS ADVISED TO COME IN FOR EVALUATION. HE WAS SEEN FOR FOLLOW UP ON (B)(6) 2025. AN MRI WAS OBTAINED. MRI WAS READ AS "SUSPECTED GRAFT MATERIAL IS THOU
Patient problems: Fibrosis; Inflammation
MAUDE report 24066012 ↗
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page