Skip to content

Adaptix™ PEEK Interbody System with Nanotechnology 74332410Recalls & reported problems

Nanovis Spine, LLC · Adaptix PEEK w/ Nano 24 x 10 x 10 · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00814216028280), received between Mar 30, 2026 and Mar 30, 2026 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 30, 2026Migration

    INFORMATION PROVIDED FROM MEDTRONIC PRODUCT EVENT SUMMARY REPORT (B)(4) RECEIVED ON (B)(6) 2026: (B)(6) 2026 (B)(6) (REP, HCP): INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION SPINAL THERAPY AT L3/4 AND L4/5. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT BACKED OUT AT THE L4/5 LEVEL. THERE WAS A LACK OF SOLID FUSION AT THE AFFECTED LEVEL. THE PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED FOR ADDITIONAL SURGERY TO REMOVE THE IMPLANT AT A LATER DATE. IT WAS UNKNOWN IF THERE WERE ANY PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT. (B)(6) 2026 (REP): ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE MANUFACTURING REPRESENTATIVE THAT THE REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2026. PATIENT HAD LINGERING BACK PAIN POST OPERATIVELY. PATIENT HAD A PRE-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS OF LUMBAR RADICULOPATHY NEEDING A L3-L5 FUSION. (B)(6) 2026 (REP): ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE MANUFACTURING REPRESENTATIVE THAT THE 2 SCREWS WERE LOOSENED AND THEY WERE EXPLANTED ON THE REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2026.

    Patient problems: Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture

    MAUDE report 24713248 ↗

Other Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar devices

All Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page