Skip to content

Neuron PNS5F130H1Recalls & reported problems

Penumbra, Inc. · Neur070Select, 130H1 · Class 2

All models of Neuron (36)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00814548010229), received between Jun 22, 2017 and Jun 19, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (3 reports).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K083125); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture3
  • Break2
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 19, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A MEDICAL PROCEDURE USING A NEURON SELECT CATHETER 5F (5F SELECT), A NON-PENUMBRA GUIDE CATHETER, AND A GUIDEWIRE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN PLANNED TO PERFORM A DIAGNOSTIC ANGIOGRAM UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA. WHILE ATTEMPTING TO ADVANCE THE 5F SELECT OVER THE GUIDEWIRE IN THE RIGHT COMMON CAROTID ARTERY (CCA), THE PHYSICIAN OBSERVED UNDER FLUOROSCOPY THAT THE DISTAL END WAS UNRESPONSIVE INDICATING A FRACTURE. THE PHYSICIAN THEN USED A SNARE DEVICE TO RETRIEVE THE FRACTURED SEGMENT. WHILE RETRACTING IT THROUGH THE AORTA, THE FRACTURED SEGMENT COULD NOT BE STABILIZED WITHIN THE GUIDE CATHETER AND MIGRATED INTO THE LEFT EXTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY. IT WAS THEN RETRIEVED USING A SNARE DEVICE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A NEW 5F SELECT AND A BENCHMARK 6F 071 DELIVERY CATHETER (BENCHMARK). THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22288890 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 10, 2024Fracture; Fracture

    THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A MEDICAL PROCEDURE IN THE CAROTID ARTERY USING A NEURON SELECT CATHETER 5F (5F SELECT) AND A STENT (UNKNOWN). DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE 5F SELECT WAS ADVANCED FROM THE RADIAL ARTERY TO THE TARGET VESSEL. THE PHYSICIAN TORQUED THE 5F SELECT AND NOTICED UNDER FLUOROSCOPY THAT THE 5F SELECT FRACTURED. THE FRACTURED DISTAL SEGMENT OF THE 5F SELECT WAS SUCCESSFULLY SNARED FROM THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED USING A NON-PENUMBRA CATHETER (UNKNOWN). THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT WAS LATER DISCHARGED HOME.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19288269 ↗
  • InjuryJan 17, 2020Break; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Break; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE IN THE CAROTID ARTERY USING NEURON SELECT CATHETERS 5F (5F SELECTS). DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHILE ADVANCING THE 5F SELECT IN THE COMMON CAROTID ARTERY, THE TIP OF THE 5F SELECT DETACHED. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO RETRIEVE THE DETACHED TIP. IT WAS REPORTED THAT IT TOOK APPROXIMATELY TWO HOURS TO RETRIEVE THE DETACHED TIP. THE PHYSICIAN THEN CONTINUED THE PROCEDURE USING A NEW 5F SELECT; HOWEVER, THE 5F SELECT BROKE, AND WAS THEREFORE REMOVED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A NEW 5F SELECT. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9602906 ↗
  • InjuryJun 22, 2017Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture

    THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A THROMBECTOMY PROCEDURE IN THE RIGHT CAROTID ARTERY USING A NEURON SELECT CATHETER 5F (5F SELECT). DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHILE ADVANCING THE 5F SELECT WITHIN THE PATIENT TO GUIDE THE NEURON MAX TO THE TARGET LOCATION IN THE HIGH CERVICAL ARTERY, THE DISTAL TIP OF THE 5F SELECT BROKE WITHIN THE AORTA ARTERY. THE PHYSICIAN WANTED TO TAKE CARE OF THE STROKE FIRST, SO HE USED A REPERFUSION CATHETER AND MICROCATHETER WITH THE SAME NEURON MAX TO REMOVE THE THROMBUS. THE BROKEN 5F SELECT TIP WAS THEN REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT USING A SNARE DEVICE AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6662375 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K083125. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2049-2009 · Jul 2, 2009 · Terminated
    Penumbra Neuron 5F Select Catheter, Neuro Deliver/Intracranial Access System Catheter, manufactured by Penumbra, Inc., Alameda, CA. Intended for the introduction of interventional

Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices

All CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page