Skip to content

CT-SPOT 118Recalls & reported problems

Beekley Corporation · CT Simulation Skin Markers for Field Borders, Tangents and Scars, 2.0mm diameter non-metallic line · Class 1

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00815137020070), received between Jul 19, 2019 and Sep 2, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Display or Visual Feedback Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Display or Visual Feedback Problem1
  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
  • Signal Artifact/Noise1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Code Available1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 2, 2025Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method

    A CT SIMULATION SKIN MARKER WAS USED UNDER A BOLUS FOR A CT-SCAN RESULTING IN AN AIR GAP ARTIFACT. AS A RESULT, THE CT-SCAN WAS REPEATED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22939672 ↗
  • InjurySep 9, 2019Signal Artifact/Noise

    A CT-SPOT MAY HAVE CAUSED ARTIFACT ON A PATIENT'S CT SCAN. AS A RESULT, THE CT SCAN WAS REPEATED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8976500 ↗
  • InjuryJul 19, 2019Display or Visual Feedback Problem

    A CT-SPOT MAY HAVE CAUSED ARTIFACT ON A PATIENT'S CT SCAN. AS A RESULT, THE CT SCAN WAS REPEATED.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 8808172 ↗

Other System, X-Ray, Film Marking, Radiographic devices

All System, X-Ray, Film Marking, Radiographic devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.