BioFire® Joint Infection (JI) Panel RFIT-ASY-0138Recalls & reported problems
Biofire Diagnostics, LLC · IVD reagent kit containing 30 kits. · Class 2
All models of BioFire Joint Infection (JI) Panel (2)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
2 open recalls name this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 2
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00815381020192), received between Apr 1, 2026 and May 28, 2026 — classified as 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “False Positive Result” (6 reports).
2 FDA recall records name this device's identifier, 2 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Aug 12, 2026Open, Classified
Due to potential contaiminated of spefic lots of pneumonia and joint infection panels that could result in false positive results
Z-0150-2027 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗
- Apr 22, 2026Class IIOpen, Classified
Contamination to in-vitro diagnostic test may result in false positives.
Z-2067-2026 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- False Positive Result6
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 28, 2026False Positive Result
THE CUSTOMER (POLAND) REPORTED A POTENTIAL FALSE POSITIVE MRSA RESULT ON THE BIOFIRE JOINT INFECTION PANEL AFTER TESTING A PERIPROSTHETIC TISSUE SAMPLE. NOTE, THIS SAMPLE TYPE IS CONSIDERED OFF-LABEL USE. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THE PATIENT WAS AFFECTED DUE TO EXCESSIVE ANTIBIOTIC TREATMENT. THE CUSTOMER DID NOT CONSIDER THE TREATMENT INAPPROPRIATE BUT NOTED THAT IT WAS EXCESSIVE. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THERE WAS NO DETERIORATION IN HEALTH DUE TO THE TREATMENT AT THIS TIME. A POTENTIAL PRODUCT MALFUNCTION WAS IDENTIFIED. DURING THE INVESTIGATION IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE CUSTOMER WAS TESTING AN OFF-LABEL SAMPLE TYPE. HOWEVER, THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THESE RESULTS FOLLOWING RECEIPT OF FIELD SAFETY CORRECTIVE ACTION, FA-TWD-000074, WHICH IDENTIFIED AN INCREASED RISK OF FALSE POSITIVE S. AUREUS ON KIT/POUCH LOT 0878825/3RXZ25.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25318410 ↗MalfunctionMay 28, 2026False Positive Result
THE CUSTOMER (POLAND) REPORTED A POTENTIAL FALSE POSITIVE STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS RESULT ON THE BIOFIRE JOINT INFECTION PANEL AFTER TESTING A PERIPROSTHETIC TISSUE SAMPLE. NOTE, THIS SAMPLE TYPE IS CONSIDERED OFF-LABEL USE. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THE PATIENT WAS AFFECTED DUE TO EXCESSIVE ANTIBIOTIC TREATMENT. THE CUSTOMER DID NOT CONSIDER THE TREATMENT INAPPROPRIATE BUT NOTED THAT IT WAS EXCESSIVE. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THERE WAS NO DETERIORATION IN HEALTH DUE TO THE TREATMENT AT THIS TIME. A POTENTIAL PRODUCT MALFUNCTION WAS IDENTIFIED. DURING THE INVESTIGATION IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE CUSTOMER WAS TESTING AN OFF-LABEL SAMPLE TYPE. HOWEVER, THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THESE RESULTS FOLLOWING RECEIPT OF FIELD SAFETY CORRECTIVE ACTION, FA-TWD-000074, WHICH IDENTIFIED AN INCREASED RISK OF FALSE POSITIVE S. AUREUS ON KIT/POUCH LOT 0878825/(B)(6).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25318403 ↗MalfunctionMay 26, 2026False Positive Result
SUMMARY: (B)(6) HOSPITAL (B)(6) (B)(6) REPORTED A POTENTIAL FALSE POSITIVE RESULT ON THE BIOFIRE JOINT INFECTION PANEL (JI) PANEL AFTER TESTING A PATIENT'S SYNOVIAL FLUID (SF). THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT DUE TO THE BIOFIRE RESULT THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH ANTI-STAPHYLOCOCCAL ANTIBIOTICS. THE PATIENT¿S CONDITION WAS MOST LIKELY ATTRIBUTABLE TO A POSTOPERATIVE HEMATOMA. THE ANTIBIOTIC TREATMENT WAS MAINTAINED EMPIRICALLY DUE TO THE TKA-RELATED COMPLICATION. NO PATIENT HARM WAS REPORTED. A POTENTIAL PRODUCT MALFUNCTION WAS IDENTIFIED. BIOFIRE HAS REQUESTED FURTHER INFORMATION FROM THE CUSTOMER AND IS CURRENTLY INVESTIGATING THIS EVENT. SIMILAR EVENTS WERE RECENTLY OBSERVED IN THE FIELD, WITH JI PANEL KIT LOTS 0878825 AND 0883425 HAVING AN ELEVATED RISK FOR FALSE POSITIVE STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS. A FIELD SAFETY CORRECTIVE ACTION (FSCA) WAS ISSUED ON (B)(6) 2026, VIA (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25279365 ↗MalfunctionApr 1, 2026False Positive Result
SUMMARY: THE CUSTOMER (BARCELONA, SPAIN) REPORTED A POTENTIAL FALSE POSITIVE STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS RESULT ON THE BIOFIRE JOINT INFECTION (JI) PANEL AFTER TESTING A PATIENT'S SAMPLE. THE CUSTOMER INDICATED THE S. AUREUS RESULT WAS REPORTED TO THE CLINICIAN, AND THE PATIENT WAS TAKEN TO THE SURGERY ROOM WITHOUT IT BEING NECESSARY. HOWEVER, NO PATIENT HARM WAS REPORTED. A POTENTIAL PRODUCT MALFUNCTION WAS IDENTIFIED. THE INVESTIGATION FOUND THAT THE MOST LIKELY CAUSE OF THE DISCREPANT RESULTS WAS CONTAMINATION DURING MANUFACTURING.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24760910 ↗MalfunctionApr 1, 2026False Positive Result
THE CUSTOMER (USA) REPORTED A POTENTIAL FALSE POSITIVE STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS RESULT ON THE BIOFIRE JOINT INFECTION PANEL AFTER TESTING A PATIENT SAMPLE. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THE PATIENT WAS NOT IMPACTED. NO PATIENT HARM WAS REPORTED. THE INVESTIGATION DETERMINED THAT THE MOST LIKELY THE CAUSE OF THE FALSE POSITIVE S. AUREUS RESULT WAS CONTAMINATION DURING MANUFACTURING
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24760769 ↗MalfunctionApr 1, 2026False Positive Result
SUMMARY: THE CUSTOMER (ZAMS, AUSTRIA) REPORTED A POTENTIAL FALSE POSITIVE STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS RESULT ON THE BIOFIRE® JOINT INFECTION (JI) PANEL AFTER TESTING A PATIENT BIOPSY SAMPLE. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE JI PANEL RESULT, AND THE CUSTOMER STATED THE PATIENT WAS NOT HARMED. THE INVESTIGATION DETERMINED THAT THE MOST LIKELY THE CAUSE OF THE FALSE POSITIVE S. AUREUS RESULT WAS CONTAMINATION DURING MANUFACTURING
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24754527 ↗
Other Orthopedic Infection Microbial Multiplex Nucleic Acid Detection System devices
- BioFire® Joint Infection (JI) Panel RFIT-ASY-0135Biofire Diagnostics, LLC · Orthopedic Infection Microbial Multiplex Nucleic Acid Detection System1 recall0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page