Skip to content

Benchmark MAX System BMX9680BER105-ARecalls & reported problems

Penumbra, Inc. · BMX96 80cm, 6F BER 105cm Select · Class 2

All models of Benchmark MAX System (13)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00815948022638), received between Jul 8, 2021 and Feb 21, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture2
  • Break1
  • Failure to Advance1
  • Fluid/Blood Leak1
  • Material Deformation1
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Foreign Body Embolism1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 21, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A MEDICAL PROCEDURE IN THE CAROTID ARTERY USING A BENCHMARK BMX96 ACCESS SYSTEM (BMX96) AND A NEURON SELECT CATHETER 6F (6F SELECT). DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHILE ADVANCING THE 6F SELECT CATHETER IN THE CAROTID ARTERY, THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED THE DISTAL LENGTH OF THE 6F SELECT HAD FRACTURED IN THE FEMORAL ARTERY UNDER FLUOROSCOPY. THEREFORE, THE PHYSICIAN REMOVED THE PROXIMAL PORTION OF THE 6F SELECT OUT FROM THE BMX96. THE PHYSICIAN THEN ADVANCED THE BMX96 FROM THE RIGHT FEMORAL ARTERY TO THE LEFT FEMORAL ARTERY AND USED A SNARE DEVICE TO SUCCESSFULLY REMOVE THE FRACTURED 6F SELECT. THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO END THE PROCEDURE AND IS RESCHEDULED FOR A LATER DATE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21437083 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 17, 2023Break; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Break; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A THROMBECTOMY PROCEDURE IN THE BASILAR/VERTEBRAL ARTERY USING A BENCHMARK BMX96 ACCESS SYSTEM (BMX96), A VELOCITY DELIVERY MICROCATHETER (VELOCITY), A NON-PENUMBRA ASPIRATION CATHETER AND A GUIDEWIRE. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT¿S ANATOMY WAS TORTUOUS. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO GAIN FEMORAL ACCESS USING THE BMX96; HOWEVER, FEMORAL ACCESS WAS NOT POSSIBLE. THEREFORE, THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO USE RADIAL APPROACH USING THE BMX96. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE RADIAL ARTERY OF THE PATIENT WAS TIGHT AND WOULD ONLY ACCOMMODATE THE BMX96 UP TO THE BRACHIAL ARTERY SEGMENT. THE PHYSICIAN THEN ADVANCED THE NON-PENUMBRA ASPIRATION CATHETER OVER THE GUIDEWIRE AND THE VELOCITY THROUGH THE BMX96 TO THE VERTEBRAL ARTERY; HOWEVER, THE ASPIRATION CATHETER HAD REACHED THE HUB OF THE BMX96 AT THIS POINT AND WOULD NOT ADVANCE FURTHER TO THE TARGET VESSEL.  THE PHYSICIAN COULD NOT TREAT THE STROKE DUE TO A LACK OF LENGTH IN THE SYSTEM, AND THEREFORE, THE VELOCITY, ASPIRATION CATHETER AND GUIDEWIRE WERE REMOVED. THE PHYSICIAN THEN INSERTED A DIFFERENT GUIDEWIRE TO REMOVE THE BMX96. WHILE ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE THE BMX96, THE PHYSICIAN EXPERIENCED RESISTANCE

    Patient problems: Foreign Body Embolism

    MAUDE report 16400994 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 16, 2022Fluid/Blood Leak; Fracture; Fluid/Blood Leak; Fracture

    THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING AN EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE IN THE INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (ICA) USING A BENCHMARK BMX96 ACCESS SYSTEM (BENCHMARK MAX), A NEURON SELECT CATHETER 5F (5F SELECT), AND A GUIDEWIRE. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT¿S ANATOMY WAS TORTUOUS. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN ADVANCED THE BMX96 OVER THE GUIDEWIRE AND 5F SELECT. SUBSEQUENTLY, AFTER 30 MINUTES OF USE AND COMPLETING AN ANGIOGRAM, THE BMX96 WAS NOTICED TO BE LEAKING. THEREFORE, THE BENCHMARK WAS REMOVED. AFTER REMOVAL, THE PHYSICIAN FOUND THE BMX96 TO BE FRACTURED MID-SHAFT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A NEW BMX96. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15439820 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 8, 2021Failure to Advance; Material Deformation; Failure to Advance; Material Deformation

    THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A MEDICAL PROCEDURE USING A BENCHMARK BMX96 ACCESS SYSTEM (BENCHMARK MAX), A NEURON SELECT CATHETER 6F (6F SELECT) AND A GUIDEWIRE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHILE TRACKING A BENCHMARK MAX OVER THE 6F SELECT IN AN ARCH TO THE TARGET VESSEL, THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED UNDER FLUOROSCOPY THAT THE BENCHMARK MAX APPEARED KINKED AND THE BENCHMARK MAX WOULD NOT ADVANCE. THEREFORE, THE BENCHMARK MAX AND THE 6F SELECT WERE REMOVED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A NON-PENUMBRA SHEATH. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT. THE EXACT EVENT DATE IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12139768 ↗

Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices

All CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page