Skip to content

Benchmark BMK6F105-ARecalls & reported problems

Penumbra, Inc. · Benchmark Catheter (6F 105 cm x STR) · Class 2

All models of Benchmark (17)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00815948025141), received between Sep 19, 2024 and Sep 19, 2024 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture1
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1
  • Unraveled Material1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 19, 2024Fracture; Unraveled Material; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Fracture; Unraveled Material; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A MEDICAL PROCEDURE IN THE INNOMINATE ARTERY USING A BENCHMARK 6F 071 DELIVERY CATHETER (BENCHMARK), NON-PENUMBRA SHEATH (6FR), NON-PENUMBRA GLIDECATH, AND A GUIDEWIRE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S ARTERIES WERE SMALL. DURING THE PROCEDURE, A 6F SHEATH WAS PLACED IN THE RADIAL ARTERY AND MEDICATION WAS ADMINISTERED. THE PHYSICIAN OBTAINED CENTRAL ACCESS USING THE GLIDECATH WITH A GUIDEWIRE. THE GUIDEWIRE WAS THEN USED TO EXCHANGE FROM THE GLIDECATH TO A BENCHMARK; HOWEVER, WHILE ADVANCING THE BENCHMARK INTO THE INNOMINATE ARTERY, THE PHYSICIAN EXPERIENCED RESISTANCE. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO RETRACT THE BENCHMARK WITHOUT THE WIRE BUT HAD DIFFICULTY. THE PHYSICIAN THEN ATTEMPTED TO USE A KELLY CLAMP TO REMOVE THE BENCHMARK, BUT THE BENCHMARK HAD FRACTURED AND BEGAN TO UNRAVEL. THE PROXIMAL END OF THE BENCHMARK WAS REMOVED FROM THE SHEATH USING THE KELLY CLAMP. THE PHYSICIAN ACCESSED THE GROIN AND USED A SNARE DEVICE TO REMOVE THE FRACTURED DISTAL END OF THE BENCHMARK FROM THE GROIN. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING NEW DEVICES. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20260807 ↗

Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices

All CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page