Skip to content

Benchmark BMK6F95MBER120-ARecalls & reported problems

Penumbra, Inc. · Benchmark Catheter (6F 95 cm x MP / 5F SEL: 120 cm x BER) · Class 2

All models of Benchmark (17)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00815948025202), received between Jan 8, 2024 and Mar 13, 2026 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture2
  • Leak/Splash2
  • Material Deformation1
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 13, 2026Fracture

    THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A MEDICAL PROCEDURE IN THE MIDDLE MENINGEAL ARTERY (MMA) USING A BENCHMARK 6F 071 DELIVERY CATHETER (BENCHMARK), A NON-PENUMBRA MICROCATHETER, A NON-PENUMBRA SHEATH (6F), NON-PENUMBRA COILS, AND LIQUID EMBOLIC AGENTS. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN SUCCESSFULLY PLACED FOUR OR FIVE COILS IN THE TARGET LOCATION. UPON REMOVAL OF THE MICROCATHETER AND BENCHMARK, THE PHYSICIAN FOUND THAT THE BENCHMARK HAD FRACTURED MID-SHAFT. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE FRACTURED SEGMENT OF THE BENCHMARK WAS WITHIN THE AORTA. THE PHYSICIAN USED A SNARE DEVICE TO SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVE THE FRACTURED SEGMENT OF THE BENCHMARK FROM THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS CONSIDERED COMPLETED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24592241 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 7, 2025Fracture; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Fracture; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A MEDICAL PROCEDURE IN THE MIDDLE MENINGEAL ARTERY (MMA) USING A BENCHMARK 6F 071 DELIVERY CATHETER (BENCHMARK) AND A NEURON SELECT CATHETER 5F (5F SELECT). DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHILE ADVANCING THE 5F SELECT THROUGH THE BENCHMARK, THE PHYSICIAN EXPERIENCED RESISTANCE. THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED THAT THE BENCHMARK FRACTURED. THEREFORE, THE 5F SELECT AND PROXIMAL PORTION OF THE BENCHMARK WERE REMOVED. AFTER A FEW ATTEMPTS, THE PHYSICIAN SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED THE DISTAL PART OF THE BENCHMARK USING A SNARE DEVICE. THE PROCEDURE HAD ENDED AT THIS POINT. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21339825 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 12, 2024Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash

    THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A COIL EMBOLIZATION MIDDLE MENINGEAL ARTERY (MMA) USING A BENCHMARK 6F 071 DELIVERY CATHETER (BENCHMARK), A NON-PENUMBRA CATHETER, AND A GUIDEWIRE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN GAINED ACCESS TO THE LEFT COMMON CAROTID USING A NON-PENUMBRA CATHETER THROUGH THE BENCHMARK. AFTER GAINING ACCESS, THE PHYSICIAN REMOVED THE NON-PENUMBRA CATHETER AND NOTICED THAT BLOOD WAS LEAKING NEAR THE HUB. THEREFORE, THE BENCHMARK WAS REMOVED AND WAS NOT USED FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER BENCHMARK. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18689175 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 8, 2024Leak/Splash; Material Deformation; Leak/Splash; Material Deformation

    THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE IN THE VERTEBRAL ARTERY USING A BENCHMARK 6F 071 DELIVERY CATHETER (BENCHMARK) AND NON-PENUMBRA COILS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT¿S ANATOMY HAS VERTEBRAL ARTERY STENOSIS. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN PLACED ONE COIL IN THE TARGET LOCATION. WHILE ADVANCING ANOTHER COIL THROUGH THE BENCHMARK, THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED THE BENCHMARK WAS KINKED AT THE PROXIMAL END. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WAS A LEAK WHERE THE KINK HAD OCCURRED. THEREFORE, THE BENCHMARK WAS REMOVED AND WAS NOT USED FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AT THIS POINT. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18469812 ↗

Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices

All CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page