Benchmark BMK6F95MBER120-ARecalls & reported problems
Penumbra, Inc. · Benchmark Catheter (6F 95 cm x MP / 5F SEL: 120 cm x BER) · Class 2
All models of Benchmark (17)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00815948025202), received between Jan 8, 2024 and Mar 13, 2026 — classified as 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture2
- Leak/Splash2
- Material Deformation1
- Physical Resistance/Sticking1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 13, 2026Fracture
THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A MEDICAL PROCEDURE IN THE MIDDLE MENINGEAL ARTERY (MMA) USING A BENCHMARK 6F 071 DELIVERY CATHETER (BENCHMARK), A NON-PENUMBRA MICROCATHETER, A NON-PENUMBRA SHEATH (6F), NON-PENUMBRA COILS, AND LIQUID EMBOLIC AGENTS. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN SUCCESSFULLY PLACED FOUR OR FIVE COILS IN THE TARGET LOCATION. UPON REMOVAL OF THE MICROCATHETER AND BENCHMARK, THE PHYSICIAN FOUND THAT THE BENCHMARK HAD FRACTURED MID-SHAFT. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE FRACTURED SEGMENT OF THE BENCHMARK WAS WITHIN THE AORTA. THE PHYSICIAN USED A SNARE DEVICE TO SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVE THE FRACTURED SEGMENT OF THE BENCHMARK FROM THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS CONSIDERED COMPLETED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24592241 ↗MalfunctionFeb 7, 2025Fracture; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Fracture; Physical Resistance/Sticking
THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A MEDICAL PROCEDURE IN THE MIDDLE MENINGEAL ARTERY (MMA) USING A BENCHMARK 6F 071 DELIVERY CATHETER (BENCHMARK) AND A NEURON SELECT CATHETER 5F (5F SELECT). DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHILE ADVANCING THE 5F SELECT THROUGH THE BENCHMARK, THE PHYSICIAN EXPERIENCED RESISTANCE. THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED THAT THE BENCHMARK FRACTURED. THEREFORE, THE 5F SELECT AND PROXIMAL PORTION OF THE BENCHMARK WERE REMOVED. AFTER A FEW ATTEMPTS, THE PHYSICIAN SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED THE DISTAL PART OF THE BENCHMARK USING A SNARE DEVICE. THE PROCEDURE HAD ENDED AT THIS POINT. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21339825 ↗MalfunctionFeb 12, 2024Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash
THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A COIL EMBOLIZATION MIDDLE MENINGEAL ARTERY (MMA) USING A BENCHMARK 6F 071 DELIVERY CATHETER (BENCHMARK), A NON-PENUMBRA CATHETER, AND A GUIDEWIRE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN GAINED ACCESS TO THE LEFT COMMON CAROTID USING A NON-PENUMBRA CATHETER THROUGH THE BENCHMARK. AFTER GAINING ACCESS, THE PHYSICIAN REMOVED THE NON-PENUMBRA CATHETER AND NOTICED THAT BLOOD WAS LEAKING NEAR THE HUB. THEREFORE, THE BENCHMARK WAS REMOVED AND WAS NOT USED FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER BENCHMARK. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18689175 ↗MalfunctionJan 8, 2024Leak/Splash; Material Deformation; Leak/Splash; Material Deformation
THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE IN THE VERTEBRAL ARTERY USING A BENCHMARK 6F 071 DELIVERY CATHETER (BENCHMARK) AND NON-PENUMBRA COILS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT¿S ANATOMY HAS VERTEBRAL ARTERY STENOSIS. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN PLACED ONE COIL IN THE TARGET LOCATION. WHILE ADVANCING ANOTHER COIL THROUGH THE BENCHMARK, THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED THE BENCHMARK WAS KINKED AT THE PROXIMAL END. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WAS A LEAK WHERE THE KINK HAD OCCURRED. THEREFORE, THE BENCHMARK WAS REMOVED AND WAS NOT USED FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AT THIS POINT. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18469812 ↗
Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page