Skip to content

enlighten enlighten IIIRecalls & reported problems

Cutera, Inc. · enlighten III Laser System · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00816722021649), received between May 23, 2025 and May 23, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1

Patient problems

  • Burn(s)1
  • Eye Injury1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 23, 2025Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method

    CUTERA, INC., RECEIVED A REPORT FROM A CLINIC INDICATING THAT A LASER TECHNICIAN SUSTAINED AN OCULAR INJURY ("PUPIL BURN") DURING A TATTOO REMOVAL PROCEDURE INVOLVING THE ENLIGHTEN III LASER SYSTEM AND AN UNSPECIFIED "PATCH." ACCORDING TO THE CLINIC, THE TECHNICIAN WAS STRUCK IN THE EYE BY A LASER BEAM "THAT REFLECTED OFF THE PATCH" AND WAS NOT WEARING PROTECTIVE EYEWEAR AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT. FOLLOWING THE INJURY, THE TECHNICIAN WAS REFERRED TO A SPECIALIST AND DIAGNOSED WITH A BURN TO THE PUPIL. BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED, THE INCIDENT APPEARS TO INVOLVE OPERATOR ERROR, SPECIFICALLY THE FAILURE TO USE APPROPRIATE EYE PROTECTION AS REQUIRED BY THE ENLIGHTEN III INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). THE CLINIC REPORTED THAT THE LASER BEAM REFLECTED OFF THE "PATCH" USED DURING THE PROCEDURE; HOWEVER, NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE BRAND OR SPECIFICATIONS OF THE PATCH WAS PROVIDED. THE ENLIGHTEN III IFU INCLUDES EXPLICIT WARNINGS REGARDING THE CRITICAL IMPORTANCE OF PROTECTIVE EYEWEAR FOR ALL INDIVIDUALS PRESENT DURING LASER OPERATION. HOWEVER, THE IFU DOES NOT ADDRESS THE USE OF THIRD-PARTY PATCHES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ENLIGHTEN III LASER SYSTEM. THERE HAS BEEN NO IND

    Patient problems: Burn(s); Eye Injury

    MAUDE report 22081619 ↗

Other Powered Laser Surgical Instrument devices

All Powered Laser Surgical Instrument devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page