THERMAGE FLX TT0.25F6-225Recalls & reported problems
Solta Medical · FLX TREATMENT TIP, EYE, 0.25CM2, 225 REP · Class 1
All models of THERMAGE FLX (8)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00816995021346), received between Jul 2, 2024 and Nov 11, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Radiation Output Problem” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Radiation Output Problem1
- Wireless Communication Problem1
Patient problems
- Burn(s)2
- Blister1
- Cyst(s)1
- Erythema1
- Hyperpigmentation1
- Subcutaneous Nodule1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 11, 2025Radiation Output Problem; Radiation Output Problem
PER THE MOST RECENT FOLLOW-UP, THE TREATING FACILITY INDICATED THAT THERE IS A HIGH LIKELIHOOD OF PERMANENT SCARRING.
Patient problems: Blister; Burn(s)
MAUDE report 23525966 ↗InjuryNov 22, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT A PATIENT EXPERIENCED A SUBCUTANEOUS CYSTIC NODULE UNDER THEIR RIGHT EYE FOLLOWING A THERMAGE FLX TREATMENT. SOLTA MEDICAL BRANDED CRYOGEN AND AN UNKNOWN AMOUNT OF COUPLING FLUID WAS USED WITH THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF TREATMENT AT 2.5. EYE SHIELDS WERE INSERTED USING NEODEX EYE SHIELD LUBRICATION. THE PATIENT RECEIVED TREATMENT TO THEIR EYELIDS AND FACE WITH NO EQUIPMENT PROBLEMS AND NO PROCEDURE ISSUES. THIS WAS THE FIRST TIME THE TREATMENT TIP WAS USED ON A PATIENT, AND IT WAS INSPECTED PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE WITH NO DISCREPANCIES OBSERVED. THE TIP WAS NOT CHECKED AT ANY TIME DURING THE TREATMENT. THE PATIENT HAD RECEIVED LDM (LOCAL DYNAMIC MICRO-MASSAGE) ULTRASOUND TREATMENT IN THE SAME SYMPTOM AREA ON THE PROCEDURE DATE BUT DID NOT UNDERGO ANY OTHER TREATMENT WITHIN 30 DAYS PRIOR. APPROXIMATELY 21 DAYS POST-PROCEDURE THE PATIENT VISITED THE HOSPITAL WITH A COMPLAINT OF A SUBCUTANEOUS CYSTIC NODULE IN THE RIGHT ORBITAL REGION. A CYSTIC LESION MEASURING 6X3X5MM WAS CONFIRMED AND IT WAS PRESUMED THAT IT MAY BE AN EPIDERMAL CYST INDUCED BY EXTERNAL STIMULI. THE USER FACILITY DETERMINED SINCE NO PROBLEMS OCCURRED DURING THE THERMAGE FLX PROCEDURE, AND IT WA
Patient problems: Cyst(s); Subcutaneous Nodule
MAUDE report 20763698 ↗InjuryJul 2, 2024Wireless Communication Problem; Wireless Communication Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT EXPERIENCED BURNS ON THE LOWER EYELID AFTER A THERMAGE FLX EYE TREATMENT. AN EYE SHIELD WAS USED TREATMENT DURING THE TREATMENT. THE DOCTOR REPORTED HAVING TROUBLE WITH THE TREATMENT AND COULD NOT PROGRESS AFTER 23 REPS DUE TO RECEIPT OF A RADIOFREQUENCY POWER ERROR/TUNING FAILURE. THE HIGHEST ENERGY LEVEL USED WAS 2.0. NO ADDITIONAL TREATMENTS WERE BEING PERFORMED AT THE SAME TIME AS THE THERMAGE FLX TREATMENT. SOLTA MEDICAL CRYOGEN AND COUPLING FLUID (1ML) WERE USED FOR THE TREATMENT. THIS WAS THE INITIAL USE OF THE TREATMENT TIP, WHICH WAS INSPECTED PRIOR TO TREATMENT BUT NOT THROUGHOUT THE TREATMENT. NO SECONDARY INTERVENTION WAS NECESSARY AS A RESULT OF THE BURN. TWO AVAILABLE PICTURES WERE REVIEWED BY THE SOLTA MEDICAL REVIEWER. THE SEQUENCE OF PICTURES AND TIMING ARE UNCLEAR; THEREFORE, THE HEALING PROCESS CANNOT BE DETERMINED. ONE PICTURE SHOWS MINOR CRUSTS UNDER EYELID WITH ERYTHEMA ON THE CHEEK, AND THE SECOND PICTURE SHOWS A HYPERPIGMENTED LINE UNDER THE EYELID AND MINOR ERYTHEMA ON THE CHEEK. THOUGH REQUESTED, NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED. THE PATIENT¿S CURRENT STATUS IS UNKNOWN AND IT IS UNKNOWN IF THERE WILL BE PERMANENT D
Patient problems: Burn(s); Erythema; Hyperpigmentation
MAUDE report 19660793 ↗
Other Massager, Therapeutic, Electric devices
- Theragun Theragun PROTherabody, Inc. · Massager, Therapeutic, Electric1 recall51 reports
- Thermage TG-2BSolta Medical · Massager, Therapeutic, Electric1 recall0 reports
- PIEZOWAVE2 100506USRichard Wolf GmbH · Massager, therapeutic, electric1 recall0 reports
- Thermage TTNS3.00E4-1200Solta Medical · Massager, Therapeutic, Electric30 reports
- THERMAGE FLX TT4.00F6-900Solta Medical · Massager, Therapeutic, Electric27 reports
- THERMAGE FLX TT0.25F6-450Solta Medical · Massager, Therapeutic, Electric13 reports
- Thermage TTNS3.00E4-900Solta Medical · Massager, Therapeutic, Electric9 reports
- THERMAGE FLX TT4.00F6-600Solta Medical · Massager, Therapeutic, Electric8 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page