VBEAM Prima Laser System 9914-00-9080Recalls & reported problems
Candela Corporation · Pulsed Laser · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00817495022963), received between Nov 4, 2024 and Nov 4, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Electrical /Electronic Property Problem1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
- Noise, Audible1
Patient problems
- Tinnitus1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 4, 2024Electrical /Electronic Property Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Noise, Audible; Electrical /Electronic Property Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Noise, Audible
CANDELA CUSTOMER, A DISTRIBUTOR IN NETHERLANDS, REPORTED THAT THERE WAS AN "EXPLOSION" WITHIN A VBEAM PRIMA WHICH OCCURRED DURING PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE OF THE DEVICE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WERE NO INJURIES RELATED TO THE EVENT; PCB BOARD WAS BOWED, AND NO FRAGMENTS BREACHED THE SYSTEM. CANDELA TEAM MET WITH CUSTOMER TO FURTHER DISCUSS THE REPORTED EVENT ON 10OCT2024. AT THIS TIME, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FIELD SERVICE ENGINEER (FSE) SERVICING THE DEVICE AT THE TIME OF THE MALFUNCTION HAD RINGING IN HIS EARS (TINNITUS) FOLLOWING THE EVENT. HE HAD NOT SOUGHT MEDICAL ATTENTION. PER CANDELA REGULATORY REPORTABILITY DECISION FOR LOUD NOISE OCCURRENCE, THE LASER OPERATES BETWEEN 50 DBA AND 70 DBA DURING NORMAL USE. IF A FAILURE WOULD OCCUR, IT WOULD BE AN IMPULSE ACOUSTICAL NOISE ABOVE 80DBA, BUT BELOW 140 DBA. THE USER OR PATIENT COULD POTENTIALLY BE SUBJECTED TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): TEMPORARY RINGING OR BUZZING IN EAR, MOST CONDITIONS LASTING LESS THAN 16 TO 48 HOURS. FURTHER FOLLOW UP FROM CUSTOMER ON (B)(6) 2024 REPORTED THAT THE FSE CONTINUED TO HAVE TINNITUS AND HAS SOUGHT MEDICAL ATTENTION. THE FSE FOLLOW-UP NOTES THAT HE STARTED THE ANNUAL PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE OF
Patient problems: Tinnitus
MAUDE report 20601782 ↗
Other Powered Laser Surgical Instrument devices
- Moxy 0010-2400Boston Scientific Corporation · Powered Laser Surgical Instrument4,572 reports
- SOLTIVE TFL-PLSGyrus ACMI, LLC · Powered laser surgical instrument6 recalls450 reports
- Flexiva TracTip M0068403960Boston Scientific Corporation · Powered laser surgical instrument562 reports
- Moses™ AC-10030100Lumenis Ltd. · Powered Laser Surgical Instrument532 reports
- Flexiva M0068403910Boston Scientific Corporation · Powered laser surgical instrument376 reports
- Visualase 9735542Medtronic Navigation, Inc. · Powered laser surgical instrument1 recall2 deaths311 reports
- SOLTIVE TFL-SLSGyrus ACMI, LLC · Powered laser surgical instrument6 recalls33 reports
- NeuroBlate® System 20980Monteris Medical Inc · Powered laser surgical instrument7 deaths296 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page