Skip to content

EyeMax2 R300P01-002Recalls & reported problems

Maxtec, LLC · Mediprema Regular EyeMax2 20/Pack · Class 1

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00817770022039), received between Mar 10, 2021 and Mar 10, 2021 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 10, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    AS DESCRIBED BY THE CUSTOMER: FIRST OF ALL, WE RECEIVED A CUSTOMER COMPLAINT ABOUT YOUR EYEMAX PRODUCT (REGULAR). OUR CUSTOMERS FIND THAT THEIR EYEMAX (BATCH NUMBER: 044284-1) APPEARED TO BE MORE SLIPPERY THAN BEFORE. THEY NEED TO REPOSITION THEM REGULARLY AND EVEN TO MAKE IT HOLD BY OTHER MEANS. IT SEEMS TO BE CAUSED BY THE NEW MATERIAL. THEY ARE AFRAID FOR THE SAFETY OF THE BABY WITH THE RISK OF EYE BURNS. IT SEEMS THAT THEY ARE THINKING ABOUT REPORTING A VIGILANCE PROBLEM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11457394 ↗

Other Pad, Neonatal Eye devices

All Pad, Neonatal Eye devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page