Skip to content

neoWave LS 23-LCT-2213Recalls & reported problems

Xenix Medical LLC · LUMBAR CAGE, 10W x 22L x 13H, 8 DEG, STRAIGHT · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00818345024311), received between Jun 14, 2024 and Jun 14, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration or Expulsion of Device” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1

Patient problems

  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 14, 2024Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration or Expulsion of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SURGEON HAD A CASE WHERE THE LUMBAR CAGE IMPLANT HAD SHIFTED POST-OPERATIVELY. THE REP STATED THAT THE PATIENT ORIGINALLY HAD A L4-5 TLIF UTILIZING A 13MM IMPLANT. PATIENT REQUIRED A REVISION SURGERY BECAUSE THE IMPLANT MIGRATED POSTERIORLY THROUGH THE DISC PREP PATHWAY. IN THE REVISION SURGERY, THE SURGEON INCREASED THE HEIGHT OF THE IMPLANT TO A 15MM HEIGHT, WHICH IS EVIDENT IN THE A/P XRAY WHERE THERE IS LESS GAP ABOVE AND BELOW THE IMPLANT AS WAS PREVIOUSLY PRESENT ON THE 13MM. THE PATIENT AGAIN HAD THE 15MM IMPLANT MOVE POSTERIORLY AND REQUIRED A REVISION SURGERY. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE 15MM IMPLANT AND REPLACED IT WITH A ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S EXPANDABLE TLIF IMPLANT. THIS IS ONE OF TWO RELATED MDRS FOR THIS PATIENT (THIS IS FOR THE FIRST REVISION PROCEDURE).

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 19541352 ↗

Other Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar devices

All Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page