CONCORDE® ProTi 360°™ 188827107Recalls & reported problems
Tyber Medical, LLC · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00819917021103), received between Jul 28, 2020 and Aug 7, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
Patient problems
- Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction1
- Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 7, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
AS REPORTED FROM COMPLAINANT: IT WAS REPORTED THAT THIS WAS A POSTERIOR FUSION (L3/4/5) AND PLIF (L4/5) PERFORMED ON (B)(6), 2024. AFTER THE SURGERY, THE PSEUDOARTHROSIS DUE TO BONE FUSION FAILURE WAS CONFIRMED. THE REMOVAL SURGERY FOR INTERVERTEBRAL CAGE IN QUESTION AND POSTERIOR SCREW IN QUESTION WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6), 2024. IN THE SURGERY, AFTER THE CAGE WAS REMOVED, THE PROTI CONCORDE 0° 9X7X27 WAS FOUND TO BE DAMAGED. THE FRAGMENT WAS IN THE BONE GRAFT SPACE OF THE CAGE AND NO INTERNAL REMAINS WERE OBSERVED. THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO SURGICAL DELAY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. FURTHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RESPONSE FROM COMPLAINANT: - LOT NUMBER - NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. - ANY IMAGING RELATED TO THE (B)(6) 2024 ORIGINAL SURGERY. - NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. - ANY IMAGING RELATED TO THE (B)(6) 2024 REMOVAL SURGERY. - NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. - WAS THE DEVICE NOTICED TO BE DAMAGED DURING THE ORIGINAL SURGERY OR ON IMAGING? - IT WAS NOTICED DURING THE SECOND SURGERY. - WILL THE DEVICE BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR RETURN? - NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. - PATIENT DETAILS - AGE, HEIGHT, WEIGHT
Patient problems: Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture
MAUDE report 19931540 ↗InjuryNov 1, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE SALES REP WAS CONTACTED BY SURGEON'S OFFICE STAFF ON 9/27/2023 REQUESTING THE METAL COMPOSITION FOR IMPLANTS USED ON A PATIENT. THE REP EMAILED THE SURGEON AND HIS STAFF DIRECTLY AFTER BEING CONTACTED. HE PROVIDED THEM WITH THE REQUESTED INFORMATION FOR DEPUY EXPEDIUM AND LEGACY SYNTHES- METAL COMPOSITION BREAKDOWNS. THEY SAID THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING SWELLING, REDNESS AND IRRITATION IN HIS ABDOMEN. POTENTIALLY MAY BE HAVING A REACTION TO THE IMPLANTS. HE WAS CONTACTED AGAIN BY SURGEON'S OFFICE THIS AFTERNOON. THE PATIENT WAS REFERRED TO A DERMATOLOGIST AND SURGEON'S OFFICE ASKED IF WE COULD PROVIDE "PATCH TEST KIT". THIS COMPLAINT INVOLVES FOUR (4) DEVICES. ONLY 1 DEVICE OUT OF THE 4 REPORTED IS MADE BY TYBER MEDICAL.
Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction
MAUDE report 18049605 ↗InjuryJul 28, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
"ON (B)(6) 2020, MIS-TLIF WAS PERFORMED IN L2/3. THE PROCEDURE WAS DELAYED MORE THAN 30 MINUTES. ON (B)(6) 2020, THE SURGEON REPORTED THAT A REMOVAL PROCEDURE WOULD BE HELD BECAUSE THE PATIENT'S INFECTION WAS SUSPECTED. ON (B)(6) 2020, THE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO REMOVE THE CONCORDE DEVICE(S) AND TRANSPLANT THE ILIUM. THERE WAS NO NOTABLE DAMAGE OR PEELING OF THE COATING ON THE DEVICE IN QUESTION. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE."
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 10334023 ↗
Other Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices
- T-PAL 03.812.003Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar152 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.004Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar120 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068073Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall66 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall51 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall46 reports
- EIT TLIF Inserter TFT30101EIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar88 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.001Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar76 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069096Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall25 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page