Protege RX SECX-8-40-135Recalls & reported problems
Covidien LP · Carotid Stent System · Class 3 · Implant
All models of Protege RX (11)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00821684038611), received between May 7, 2021 and May 7, 2021 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Premature Activation” (1 report).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P060001); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Premature Activation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 7, 2021Premature Activation; Premature Activation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PHYSICIAN WAS ATTEMPTING TO USE A PROTEGE RX STENT TO TREAT THE COMMON CAROTID ARTERY IN A PATIENT. THERE WERE NO ABNORMALITIES REPORTED IN RELATION TO ANATOMY. EMBOLIC PROTECTION WAS USED. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO PACKAGING (I.E. SHELF CARTON, HOOP/TRAY). THERE WERE NO ISSUES NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE HOOP/TRAY. THE DEVICE PREPPED PER THE IFU WITHOUT ISSUE. THE THUMBSCREW/LOCK-PIN WAS CHECKED FOR SECUREMENT PRIOR TO PROCEDURE. THE LOCK PIN WAS REMOVED DURING IFU PREPARATION. IT IS REPORTED THE STENT WAS PARTIALLY PRE-DEPLOYED IN VIVO DURING PROCEDURE FOLLOWING IFU, SO IT COULD NOT BE USED. IT IS UNKNOWN IF INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED TO REMOVE THE STENT FROM THE PATIENT'S VESSEL. THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11788859 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under P060001. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0878-2015 · Dec 4, 2014 · Terminatedev3 Protege Rx Tapered Carotid Stent System, SECX-10-7-40-135, Sterile EO, Rx only. Indicated for the treatment of patients at high risk for adverse events from carotid endartere
- Z-0879-2015 · Dec 4, 2014 · Terminatedev3, Protg Rx Tapered Carotid Stent System, SEPX-8-6-40-135, Sterile EO, Rx only. Indicated for the treatment of patients at high risk for adverse events from carotid endarterect
Other STENT, CAROTID devices
- Neuroguard IEP® System NG-0740-140-2Contego Medical, Inc. · Stent, Carotid2 recalls32 reports
- Neuroguard IEP® System NG-NV-6-40Contego Medical, Inc. · Stent, Carotid2 recalls9 reports
- Neuroguard IEP® System NG-NV-7-40Contego Medical, Inc. · Stent, Carotid2 recalls8 reports
- ENROUTE Transcarotid Stent SR-0940-CSSilk Road Medical, Inc. · Stent, Carotid1 recall5 deaths58 reports
- Neuroguard IEP® System NG-0640-140-2Contego Medical, Inc. · Stent, Carotid2 recalls7 reports
- ENROUTE Transcarotid Stent SR-1040-CSSilk Road Medical, Inc. · Stent, Carotid1 recall3 deaths56 reports
- CGuard Prime Carotid Stent System CND0840Inspire M.D Ltd · Stent, Carotid1 recall1 death41 reports
- CGuard Prime Carotid Stent System CND0940Inspire M.D Ltd · Stent, Carotid1 recall31 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page