TrailBlazer™ SC-018-135 (UDI 00821684058008)Recalls & reported problems
Ev3, Inc · PS SC-018-135 TRAILBLAZER V03 · Class 2
All models of TrailBlazer (13)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00821684058008), received between Jun 10, 2018 and Dec 22, 2020 — classified as 2 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (3 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K092299); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component3
- Difficult to Remove1
- Material Puncture/Hole1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryDec 22, 2020Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component
PHYSICIAN WAS ATTEMPTING TO USE A TRAILBLAZER DURING PROCEDURE TO TREAT THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED WITH NO ISSUES NOTED. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED PER IFU WITH NO ISSUES IDENTIFIED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DISTAL TIP WAS SEPARATED FROM THE CATHETER AND COULD NOT BE REMOVED FROM THE VESSEL. AN EVERFLEX STENT WAS IMPLANTED TO CAGE THE DETACHED TIP AGAINST THE VESSEL WALL. NO FURTHER INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11053750 ↗MalfunctionDec 7, 2018Material Puncture/Hole; Material Puncture/Hole
PHYSICIAN USED A TRAILBLAZER WITH A 6F X 45 CM NON-MEDTRONIC SHEATH AND 0.018 NON-MEDTRONIC GUIDEWIRE DURING TREATMENT OF A FIBROUS CTO (CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION -100%) IN THE MID LEFT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). SLIGHT TORTUOSITY AND MODERATE CALCIFICATION WERE REPORTED. IFU WAS FOLLOWED. IT IS REPORTED THE WIRE APPEARED TO HAVE PERFORATED THE TRAILBLAZER. FROM ANGIOGRAPHIC APPEARANCE, THE WIRE PROLAPSED IN THE ARTERY OUTSIDE OF THE SUPPORT CATHETER. THE WIRE AND TRAILBLAZER WERE BOTH REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT WITH NO ISSUES NOTED. THE PROCEDURE WAS ABORTED. NO INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8141650 ↗MalfunctionJul 4, 2018Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO USE A NITREX GUIDEWIRE (0.018" 300CM) AND A TRAILBLAZER (0.018" 135CM) WITH A 6FR NON-MEDTRONIC SHEATH TO THE LEFT MID POSTERIOR TIBIAL ARTERY WITH 90% STENOSIS. THE LESION LENGTH WAS REPORTED AS 65MM. EMBOLIC PROTECTION WAS NOT USED. THE VESSEL WAS PRE-DILATED WITH A 2.5X80MM BALLOON AT 8ATM. NO ABNORMALITIES WERE REPORTED IN RELATION TO THE PATIENTS ANATOMY. THE DEVICES WERE PREPPED AS PER THE IFU. DURING THE PROCEDURE THE GUIDEWIRE WAS INFLATED AND SQUEEZED INTO THE SUPPORT CATHETER. THE STRUCTURE OF THE GUIDEWIRE WAS REPORTED TO BE ¿BROKEN¿, SO BOTH DEVICES WERE COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY USING A NON-MEDTRONIC 0,014¿ 300CM GUIDEWIRE AND A 0,014¿ 150CM TRAILBLAZER. THE LESION WAS POST DILATED WITH A 4X80MM BALLOON AT 8ATM. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7662445 ↗InjuryJun 10, 2018Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A TRAILBLAZER CATHETER BROKE AND THAT A PIECE OF CATHETER REMAINED IN THE PATIENT BODY.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque
MAUDE report 7585465 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K092299. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0497-2010 · Nov 6, 2009 · TerminatedTrailBlazer Support Catheter, ev3 inc, 4600 Nathan Lane North, Plymouth, MN 55442-2920, Rx Only, Sterile EO. US Model Numbers: SC-014-135, SC-018-090, SC-035-065, SC-035-135, SC-
Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page