EverFlex™ Protégé™ EverFlex™ PRB35-06-080-120Recalls & reported problems
Ev3, Inc · STENT PRB35-06-080-120 PROTEGE EF V07 · Class 3 · Implant
All models of EverFlex Protégé EverFlex (27)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00821684059920), received between Nov 18, 2020 and Mar 25, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).
3 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P110023); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component2
- Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 25, 2026Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem
A PHYSICIAN WAS ATTEMPTING TO USE A PROTEGE EVERFLEX FOR TREATMENT OF A CALCIFIED LESION IN THE MID RIGHT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. A 6FR NON MEDTRONIC SHEATH AND 0.014" NON MEDTRONIC GUIDEWIRE WERE USED. THE VESSEL WAS PRE-DILATED WITH A 5X40 NANOCROSS. THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE DURING ADVANCEMENT AND THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. IT WAS REPORTED THE STENT PARTIALLY DEPLOYED (AT TARGET SITE) WITHIN THE PATIENT VASCULATURE. THE THUMBSCREW/LOCK-PIN WAS CHECKED FOR SECUREMENT. THE DEVICE WAS SUCCESSFULLY IN TANDEM WITH DELIVERY SYSTEM WITHOUT INJURY/INTERVENTION. ANOTHER EVERFLEX WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. NO PATIENT INJURY OR INTERVENTION WAS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. AN EVERCROSS WAS USED FOR POST-DILATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24685429 ↗InjuryFeb 13, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE INVOLVING THE PROTEGE EVER FLEX SELF-EXPANDING STENT, A DELIVERY CATHETER COMPONENT DETACHED. THE EVENT OCCURRED IN THE PERIPHERAL ARTERY, SPECIFICALLY THE MID-LOCATION OF THE RIGHT POPLITEAL ARTERY, WHICH WAS CALCIFIED WITH A DIAMETER OF 6MM. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A SNARE TO RETRIEVE THE DETACHED TIP OF THE DELIVERY CATHETER. THE VESSEL WAS BOTH PRE-DILATED AND POST-DILATED, AND THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE WERE FOLLOWED WITHOUT ISSUE. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21374191 ↗MalfunctionNov 18, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
PHYSICIAN WAS ATTEMPTING TO USE PROTEGE EVERFLEXT DURING PROCEDURE TO TREAT A MODERATELY CALCIFIED LESION IN THE MID SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) WITH 80% STENOSIS. THE VESSEL WAS MODERATELY TORTUOUS. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO PACKAGING. THERE WAS NO ISSUES NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM HOOP/TRAY. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED PER IFU WITH NO ISSUES IDENTIFIED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHILE DEPLOYING THE STENT, THE PROXIMAL "PULL" SEGMENT DETACHED FROM THE CATHETER. THE BREAK/FRACTURE OCCURRED AT THE HANDLE. NOTHING DETACHED IN THE BODY. THE LESION WAS NOT PRE DILATED. THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY-DEPLOYED STENT. NO RESISTANCE ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO DEPLOY THE STENT USING A FIRM GRIP ON THE OUTER SHEATH THAT CONSTRAINS THE STENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10859587 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under P110023. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0623-2024 · Nov 20, 2023 · CompletedProtege GPS Self-Expanding Peripheral Stent System, product number SERB65-09-60-80, Sterile.
- Z-1644-2022 · Jul 14, 2022 · Open, ClassifiedEverFlex Self-Expanding Peripheral Stent with Entrust Delivery System
- Z-2048-2016 · May 23, 2016 · TerminatedEV3 EverFiex" Self-expanding Peripheral Stent System, Sterilized using Ethylene Oxide, Rx Only, PRB35-08-040-080. The Protege EverFiex" Self-expanding Peripheral Stent System is a
Other STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY devices
- EverFlex™ EVD35-06-150-120Covidien LP · STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY1 death110 reports
- SUPERA S-60-150-120-P6Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY108 reports
- SUPERA S-55-150-120-P6Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY88 reports
- LifeStent® Solo Vascular Stent EX062003CLBard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY80 reports
- BioMimics 3D Vascular Stent System 144700-12Veryan Medical Limited · Stent, Superficial Femoral Artery74 reports
- SUPERA S-50-120-120-P6Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY55 reports
- EverFlex™ EVD35-07-060-120Covidien LP · STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY1 recall5 reports
- EverFlex™ EVD35-07-120-120Covidien LP · STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY1 recall5 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page