EverCross™ AB35W10020080Recalls & reported problems
Ev3, Inc · PTA AB35W10020080 EVERCROSS 035 V05 · Class 2
All models of EverCross (114)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00821684062210), received between Mar 20, 2019 and Mar 20, 2019 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Deflation Problem” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Deflation Problem1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 20, 2019Deflation Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Deflation Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE PHYSICIAN USED AN EVERCROSS TO TREAT A SOFT TISSUE LESION IN THE MID COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY. A NON MEDTRONIC 8FR SHEATH AND A 0.35 X 260 GUIDEWIRE WAS USED FOR THE PROCEDURE. NO EMBOLIC PROTECTION WAS USED. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE TO THE DEVICE PACKAGING AND NO ISSUES REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM ITS PACKAGING. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED PER IFU WITH NO ISSUES. THE DEVICE PASSED THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. NO RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED DURING ADVANCEMENT OF THE DEVICE AND EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS NOT USED. THE BALLOON WAS USED TO TREAT THE AREA AND WAS INFLATED USING AN INFLATION DEVICE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON DETACHED DURING REMOVAL OF THE DEVICE FROM THE SHEATH AT THE END OF THE PROCEDURE. THE BALLOON DETACHED IN THE SHEATH AND BOTH THE DEVICE AND SHEATH WERE REMOVED TOGETHER. THE PHYSICIAN WAS UNSURE IF THE BALLOON HAD COMPLETELY DEFLATED. THE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS AND NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8435863 ↗
Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page