NanoCross™ Elite AB14W040150150 (UDI 00821684066829)Recalls & reported problems
Ev3, Inc · PTA AB14W040150150 NANOCROSS 014 V04 · Class 2
All models of NanoCross Elite (63)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00821684066829), received between Jan 7, 2019 and Jan 7, 2019 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Burst Container or Vessel” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Burst Container or Vessel1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 7, 2019Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel
THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO USE A NANOCROSS BALLOON 014 WITH A NON-MEDTRONIC 6 FR SHEATH AND A NON-MEDTRONIC INFLATION DEVICE TO TREAT A FIBROUS LESION, MODERATELY CALCIFIED WITH CTO (CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION-100%) IN THE RIGHT DISTAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). ARTERY LENGTH AND DIAMETER WERE 40 MM AND 6 MM, RESPECTIVELY. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED AS PER THE IFU AND NO ISSUES WERE NOTED. THE PHYSICIAN EXPERIENCED RESISTANCE UPON ADVANCING WITH THE DEVICE THROUGH THE LESION, BUT NO EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS USED. THE DEVICE PASSED THROUGH A PREVIOUS DEPLOYED STENT. A BALLOON BURST (RUPTURE) WAS REPORTED DURING INFLATION AT 6 ATM. ALL FRAGMENTS OF THE BALLOON WERE RETRIEVED. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO USE A SECOND BALLOON, A NANOCROSS ELITE 6 X 20 X 150 AND THE SAME ISSUE OCCURRED, THE BALLOON RUPTURED DURING INFLATION AT 6 ATM USING THE SAME INFLATION DEVICE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A 6 X 40 PACIFIC PLUS CROSS AND THEN A 6 X 20 FORTEX BALLOON. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8221517 ↗
Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page