Protégé EverFlex™ PRB35-05-080-120Recalls & reported problems
Ev3, Inc · STENT PRB35-05-080-120 PROTEGE EF V08 · Class 3 · Implant
All models of Protégé EverFlex (5)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00821684068588), received between Jul 9, 2018 and Sep 23, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component2
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
- Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1
- Difficult to Remove1
- Material Deformation1
Patient problems
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- Unspecified Tissue Injury1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 23, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO IMPLANT A PROTEGE EVERFLEX STENT WITH A 035 GUIDEWIRE FOR THE TREATMENT OF A SOFT TISSUE LESION IN THE PATIENTS LEFT MID ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA. SEVERE TORTUOSITY WAS REPORTED. THERE WERE NO ABNORMALITIES REPORTED IN RELATION TO ANATOMY. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO PACKAGING (I.E. SHELF CARTON, HOOP/TRAY). THE IFU (INSTRUCTION FOR USE) WAS FOLLOWED DURING PREPARATION, PROCEDURE, POST-PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ISSUES NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE HOOP/TRAY. EMBOLIC PROTECTION WAS NOT USED. THE VESSEL WAS NOT POST-DILATED. THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. MODERATE RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MARKERBAND DISLODGED DURING USE IN THE PATIENT. THE STENT WAS DEPLOYED IN THE TARGET LOCATION AND REMAINS IN THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO DEFORMATION NOTED TO THE DEPLOYED STENT. THE PATIENT WAS TAKEN TO SURGERY FOR REMOVAL OF FOREIGN BODY. THE DEVICE WAS SAFELY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS ABORTED. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20278597 ↗InjurySep 22, 2021Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Material Deformation; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Material Deformation
PHYSICIAN WAS ATTEMPTING TO USE AN PROTÉGÉ EVERFLEX SELF-EXPANDING STENT TO TREAT A FIBROUS LESION IN A FISTULA. A 6FR NON-MEDTRONIC SHEATH WAS USED. A .035 GUIDEWIRE WAS USED. DEVICE WAS PREPPED PER IFU. IT WAS REPORTED THAT STENT DISLODGEMENT OCCURRED DURING REMOVAL FOLLOWING FAILED DELIVERY. STENT WAS IN THE SHEATH. THEY PULLED THE SHEATH OUT OF THE BODY. DISLODGED STENT WAS REMOVED FROM PATIENT. A SECOND PROTÉGÉ EVERFLEX STENT WAS OPENED. A 6FR NON-MEDTRONIC SHEATH WAS USED. A .035 GUIDEWIRE WAS USED. IFU WAS FOLLOWED. STENT DISLODGEMENT OCCURRED DURING DELIVERY TO/AT LESION. STENT WAS SURGICALLY REMOVED. PATIENT WAS IN THE OR AND SURGEON DID A REVISION ON THE FISTULA. NO FURTHER INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Tissue Injury
MAUDE report 12512658 ↗InjuryNov 9, 2018Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN INTENDED TO USE A PROTÉGÉ EVERFLEX SELF EXPANDING STENT TO TREAT A CTO IN THE RIGHT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY(SFA). THE LESION WAS CROSSED WITH A WIRE AND ATHERECTOMY PERFORMED FOLLOWED BY BALLOON INFLATION. THE PHYSICIAN THEN INSERTED THE SELF EXPANDING STENT. THE STENT WAS ADVANCED AND DEPLOYED SUCCESSFULLY. IT WAS REPORTED THE DELIVERY CATHETER WAS WITHDRAWN, A DEVICE COMPONENT WAS OBSERVED BY ANGIOGRAM AT THE LATERAL BRANCH OF THE PROFUNDA ARTERY PROXIMAL TO THE DEPLOYED STENT. ATTEMPTS TO SNARE THE COMPONENT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. ANGIOGRAM SHOWS FOREIGN BODY IN THE LATERIAL BRANCH OF THE PROFUNDA ARTERY.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque
MAUDE report 8054563 ↗MalfunctionJul 9, 2018Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component
PATIENT IN CATH LAB FOR RIGHT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) LEG INTERVENTION. TOTAL OCCLUSION CROSSED WITH WIRE, ATHERECTOMY PERFORMED AND BALLOON INFLATION COMPLETED. DECISION TO INSERT SELF-DEPLOYMENT STENT. STENT ADVANCED WITHOUT DIFFICULTY AND SELF-DEPLOYMENT COMPLETED. DELIVERY CATHETER WITHDRAWN AND NOTICED TO BE MISSING BY SCRUB TECH. ANGIOGRAM SHOWS FOREIGN BODY AT PROFUNDA ARTERY PROXIMAL TO DEPLOYED STENT. ATTEMPTS TO SNARE FOREIGN BODY UNSUCCESSFUL. ANGIOGRAM SHOWS FOREIGN BODY IN LATERAL BRANCH OFF OF PROFUNDA.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque
MAUDE report 7669343 ↗
Other STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY devices
- EverFlex™ EVD35-06-150-120Covidien LP · STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY1 death110 reports
- SUPERA S-60-150-120-P6Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY108 reports
- SUPERA S-55-150-120-P6Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY88 reports
- LifeStent® Solo Vascular Stent EX062003CLBard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY80 reports
- BioMimics 3D Vascular Stent System 144700-12Veryan Medical Limited · Stent, Superficial Femoral Artery74 reports
- SUPERA S-50-120-120-P6Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY55 reports
- EverFlex™ EVD35-07-060-120Covidien LP · STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY1 recall5 reports
- EverFlex™ EVD35-07-120-120Covidien LP · STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY1 recall5 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page