SilverHawkTM P4055Recalls & reported problems
Covidien LP · ATHERECTOMY P4055 SILVERHAWK ATK V03 · Class 2
All models of SilverHawkTM (7)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00821684074145), received between May 17, 2017 and Dec 7, 2018 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K061188); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component2
- Break1
- Mechanical Problem1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
- Patient Problem/Medical Problem1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 7, 2018Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
THE PHYSICIAN USED A SILVERHAWK DEVICE TO TREAT A SOFT TISSUE LESION WITH LITTLE DEGREE OF CALCIFICATION AND 90% STENOSIS IN THE MID SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). THE VESSEL PRESENTED LITTLE TORTUOSITY. THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED PRIOR TO USE AND PREPPED WITH NO ISSUED IDENTIFIED. IFU WAS FOLLOWED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER ONE INSERTION AND EIGHT PASSES, THE THUMBSWITCH BECAME JAMMED. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8141042 ↗InjuryJul 4, 2018Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO USE A SILVERHAWK WITH A NON-MEDTRONIC SHEATH AND GUIDEWIRE AS PER THE IFU TO TREAT A PLAQUE LESION WITH LITTLE CALCIFICATION AND LITTLE TORTUOSITY WITH 75% STENOSIS IN THE PROXIMAL LEFT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. THE ARTERY DIAMETER AND LENGTH WERE 6MM AND 100MM RESPECTIVELY. NO ABNORMALITIES WERE REPORTED IN RELATION TO THE PATIENT¿S ANATOMY. THE LESION WAS NOT PRE-DILATED. IT WAS REPORTED THE TIP DETACHED DURING ADVANCEMENT. THE WIRE LUMEN COVERING BECAME DETACHED DURING ADVANCEMENT OF THE CATHETER OVER ILIAC BIFURCATION, MODERATE RESISTANCE WAS FELT. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT DURING ADVANCEMENT OF THE CATHETER OVER THE ILIAC BIFURCATION RESISTANCE WAS FELT, MORE PRESSURE WAS APPLIED BUT APPARENTLY THE CATHETER BECAME STUCK AND CAUSED THE SHEATH TO PROLAPSE INTO THE AORTA. AS THE PHYSICIAN WAS TRYING TO REMOVE THE CATHETER FROM THE SHEATH THE WIRE LUMEN COVERING PORTION BECAME COMPLETELY DETACHED AND ENDED UP BEING DEPOSITED IN THE LEFT COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY AREA. THE LESION TREATED WAS THE DISTAL RIGHT SFA. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE DURING THE PROCEDURE. AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO SNARE THE PIECE OF WIRE LUMEN COVERING, THAT BECAME LODGED IN T
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; Patient Problem/Medical Problem
MAUDE report 7662327 ↗MalfunctionJun 28, 2017Break; Break
PHYSICIAN WAS USING A SILVERHAWK DEVICE FOR AN ATHERECTOMY PROCEDURE OF A FIBROUS LESION IN THE LEFT PROXIMAL SFA WITH 80% STENOSIS. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED PER IFU. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WAS DIFFICULTY IN FLUSHING THE TISSUE OUT OF THE NOSECONE. PROBE WAS UNABLE TO PUSH OUT THE TISSUE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A NEW TURBOHAWK DEVICE. NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6676027 ↗MalfunctionMay 17, 2017Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO USE A SILVERHAWK DIRECTIONAL ATHERECTOMY CATHETER DURING PROCEDURE. A 7FR 45CM SHEATH AND .014 GUIDEWIRE FOR THE TREATMENT OF A MODERATELY CALCIFIED LESION IN THE LEFT MID SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY WHICH DISPLAYED A MODERATE DEGREE OF TORTUOSITY. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED AS PER IFU. MINIMAL RESISTANCE WAS FELT DURING ADVANCEMENT. THE TIP DETACHED AT THE HINGE PIN DURING ADVANCEMENT OF DEVICE THROUGH SHEATH. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND A NEW DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6574202 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K061188. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-1162-2010 · Jan 21, 2010 · TerminatedSilverHawk Peripheral Cutter Driver Plaque Excision System REF Catalog No: FG 02550, Sterilized with gamma radiation, Manufacturer ev3 Inc. 4600 Nathan Lane North, Plymouth, MN 554
Other Catheter, peripheral, atherectomy devices
- HawkOne™ H1-MCovidien LP · Catheter, peripheral, atherectomy1 recall367 reports
- JETSTREAM™ XC 112266-001Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, peripheral, atherectomy288 reports
- JETSTREAM™ XC 112264-001Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, peripheral, atherectomy262 reports
- SET Rotarex®S 6F 135cm (Straub Medical®) Version 1.0Straub Medical AG · Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy2 deaths206 reports
- SET Rotarex™S 6 F x 135 cm 80237Straub Medical AG · Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy1 recall79 reports
- HawkOne™ H1-SCovidien LP · Catheter, peripheral, atherectomy1 recall70 reports
- Turbo-Elite Laser Atherectomy Catheter 420-006Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy2 recalls19 reports
- Turbo-Elite Laser Atherectomy Catheter 417-152Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy2 recalls16 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page